A critical evaluation of research associated with carers’ organisations since the start of the Carers' Movement

Author:

Crossdale RachelORCID,Buckner LisaORCID

Abstract

PurposeSince the start of the Carers’ Movement research into unpaid care and carers has been used to advocate for policy change. The purpose of this paper is to address the changes in research into unpaid care and carers since the start of the Carers’ Movement and to explore the relationship between these changes and social policy.Design/methodology/approachThis research paper is based on a qualitative study of documents within the Carers UK archive.FindingsResearch into unpaid care and carers has changed focus from caregiving as an identity and lifestyle to an interruption to “normal” life and employment. Changes in research are intertwined with changes in policy, with research evidencing advocation for policy change and policy change fuelling further research. Changes in the methodology of this research exposes transition points in the Carers’ Movement and in social research more broadly.Practical implicationsThis paper contributes to critical understandings of the relationship between research into unpaid care and caring and policy. The paper also contributes to debates on methodology, exploring how the methodological zeitgeist presents in archived research.Social implicationsUnderstanding how current research into unpaid care and carers has been developed and acknowledging the role of policy in research development brings available data on unpaid care and caring under scrutiny.Originality/valueThis paper is original in developing a critical analysis of the relationship between research into unpaid care and carers and social policy.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science

Reference97 articles.

1. What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up;Social Science and Medicine,2008

2. Ball, P. (2022), “The threat of Covid isn’t over so why does Britain have a conspiracy of silence about it?”, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/aug/15/covid-britain-politicians-pandemic-protective-measures (accessed 16 August 2022).

3. The privatisation and financialisation of social care in the UK,2020

4. Brooks, J. (2012), “Retrospective time perception of a long task: using music to distinguish between attention based and memory-based models”, available at: http://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=spsyc_pres (accessed 27 May 2015).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3