Perceptions of successful domestic and international research grant applications among experienced and novice researchers

Author:

Suebtrakul Sumeth,Adams Pornpimon,Vutikes Pitchapa,Titapiwatanakun Boosaree,Adams Paul,Kaewkungwal Jaranit

Abstract

PurposeThe main purpose of the study was to identify the key elements that characterize successful grant proposals and the relative importance of issues that constitute difficulties and concerns in preparing the proposals. The study aimed, in particular, to explore grantsmanship perceptions based on the experiences of researchers in Thailand who had, or had not yet, successfully been awarded domestic and/or international research funding.Design/methodology/approachAnonymous online questionnaires were distributed to researchers in biomedical and public health fields in Thai academic institutes. The online survey asked the anonymous participants to complete a questionnaire comprising both multiple-choice and open-ended questions.FindingsAbout 19% of 300 respondents had received both domestic and international research grants, and 60% of domestic research grants. The top 5 issues in grant applications were: (1) choosing a topic that matched the grant opportunity, (2) feasibility of research design and methods, (3) suitable research design and methodology, (4) model and theoretical justification, and (5) ethical considerations. Significant differences in perceptions among researchers were found for the feasibility of research design and methods and proposing a reasonable and justifiable budget.Originality/valueThe information derived from this analysis reflected the perceptions of the researchers and may or may not correlate with those of grant agency reviewers. The results of this study may be insightful and instructive for other researchers and form the basis for training and mentoring researchers in informed and effective grantsmanship, particularly novice researchers with limited or no experience in grant proposal writing. This study particularly reflected grantsmanship perceptions among researchers in Thailand. It may also serve to exemplify lessons learned for researchers in other low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) exposed to similar settings and situations applying for research grants.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference22 articles.

1. Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study;BMJ Open,2015

2. Secrets of successful grant writing to support rural special education programs;Rural Spec. Educ. Q,2014

3. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance [CFDA]. Developing and writing grant proposals. [cited 2017 Dec]. Available from: https://cfda.symplicity.com/downloads/CFDA_writing.pdf.

4. Brown CM. How to write a winning grant proposal. [updated 2010 Jul; cited 2017 Dec]. Available from: https://www.inc.com/guides/2010/07/how-to-write-a-grant-proposal.html.

5. National Institutes of Health [NIH]. Quick guide for grant applications. [updated 2010 Sep; cited 2017 Dec]. Available from: https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Training/Training_Quick_Guide_for_Grant_Applications-rev-2010.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3