It can still happen here: systemic risk factors that may contribute to the continued abuse of people with intellectual disabilities

Author:

Marsland Dave,Oakes Peter,Bright Naomi

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the response to the scandal of abuse in services for people with intellectual disabilities in the light of research evidence and analysis. Design/methodology/approach – Critical reflection and review of literature. In particular, recent research into possible indicators that a service is at risk of becoming abusive is used to test the hypotheses and implied solutions that are currently being adopted. Findings – That some of the responses to recent scandals are necessary but not sufficient to prevent future harm. Furthermore, some of the proposed solutions may actually increase the likelihood of further abuse. Prevention of abuse requires a broader and more evidence-based response. Originality/value – The synthesis of research and analysis presented here has not been presented previously in the published literature.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Social Psychology,Phychiatric Mental Health

Reference52 articles.

1. Biggs, S. , Stevens, M. , Tinker, A. , Dixon, J. and Lee, L. (2009), “Institutional mistreatment and dignity: toward a conceptual understanding”, A paper for the Department of Health and Comic Relief. National Centre for Social Research, King’s College, London.

2. Brown, H. and Turk, V. (1992), “Defining sexual abuse as it affects adults with learning disabilities”, Mental Handicap , Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 44-55.

3. Bubb, S. (2014), Winterbourne View: Time for Change. A Report by the Transforming Care and Commissioning Steering Group, Chaired by Sir Stephen Bubb , Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.

4. Burns, D. , Hyde, P. and Killett, A. (2013), “Wicked problems or wicked people? Reconceptualising institutional abuse”, Sociology of Health and Illness , Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 514-28.

5. Care Quality Commission (2014), “Consultation on our guidance for fundamental standards and on our enforcement procedures. A quick guide”, available at: www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20140808_Quick_GuideRegs_Enforcement_consultation_CQC.pdf (accessed 10 October 2014).

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3