Commentary on “Implementation of policy regarding restrictive practices in England”

Author:

Frederiks Brenda

Abstract

Purpose In the Netherlands, as in England, concerns exist about the extent of and frequency with which freedom-restricting measures are applied. The view is that use of these measures needs to decrease. The purpose of this paper is to outline new legislation that is expected to come into force in the Netherlands in 2020. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides a description of legislation entering into force on 1 January 2020. Findings Many of the new legislation’s practical implications remain unclear, including the definition of involuntary care. Research limitations/implications The new legislation will start being monitored directly after coming into force, and only then the authors will make out what works well and what does not. Practical implications Introducing new legislation on coercion is not sufficient. Careful implementation of the legislation is important, including the way it defines involuntary care. Originality/value In 2020, the Netherlands is introducing new legislation on involuntary care for people with an intellectual disability. This includes a definition of involuntary care.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Social Psychology,Pshychiatric Mental Health

Reference5 articles.

1. Applying restrictive measures in the care of adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities: attitudes of support staff and policy implications;Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,2018

2. Reporting of use of coercive measures from a Dutch perspective;Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities,2017

3. Restriction on restraints in the care for people with intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands: lessons learned from Australia, UK and United States;Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,2012

4. Reliability and feasibility of systematic registration of coercive measures in care for people with intellectual disabilities;Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,2018

5. Practitioner explanations for the increasing use of restraint measures in the care of people with intellectual disabilities in Norway 2000-11;Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3