An institutional logics approach to the heterogeneous world of highly skilled work

Author:

Pernicka Susanne,Reichel Astrid

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship of highly skilled work and (collective) power. It develops an institutional logics perspective and argues that highly skilled workers’ propensity to join trade unions varies by institutional order. Design/methodology/approach – Data from two occupational fields in Austria, university professors and management consultants, representing two different institutional orders were collected via questionnaires. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was employed to test the hypotheses. Findings – The results show that over and above organisational level variables, individual's background and employee power variables institutional logics significantly add to explaining trade union membership of highly skilled workers. Prevalence of a professional logic in a field makes collective action more likely than market logic. Originality/value – Highly skilled workers are overall described as identifying themselves more with the goals of their employer or client and with their professional peers than with other corporate employees or organised labour. They are thus expected to develop consent rather than conflict orientation vis-á-vis their employers and clients. This paper supports a differentiated view and shows that within highly skilled work there are groups engaging in collective action. By developing an institutional logics perspective it provides a useful approach to explain heterogeneity within the world of highly skilled work.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference63 articles.

1. Abbott, A. (1988), The System of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL and London.

2. Abel, J. , Ittermann, P. and Pries, L. (2005), “Erwerbsregulierung in hochqualifizierter Wissensarbeit – individuell und kollektiv, diskursiv und partizipativ”, Industrielle Beziehungen, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 28-51.

3. Akerlof, G. (1982), “Labor contracts as partial gift-exchange”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 97 No. 4, pp. 543-569.

4. Alvesson, M. (2004), Knowledge Work and Knowledge Intensive Firms, Oxford UP, Oxford.

5. Arthur, M.B. and Rousseau, D.B. (1996), The Boundaryless Career. A New Employment for a New Organizational Era, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, Oxford.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3