Author:
Koh S.C.L.,Gunasekaran A.,Saad S.M.
Abstract
PurposeTo present the application of a business model for holistic uncertainty management for twenty‐first century manufacturing enterprises.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire survey is carried out to UK manufacturing enterprises to collect relevant data, and analysis of variance (ANOVA), correlation analysis and cluster analysis are performed to infer the results.FindingsIt can be concluded that different manufacturing environments suffer different effects of underlying causes of uncertainty on product tardy delivery. The product tardy delivery performance in make‐to‐order (MTO) manufacturing environment is found significantly affected by a wide range of underlying causes of uncertainty. It is interesting to find that mixed‐mode (MM) manufacturing environment has an opposite outcome. Correlation results provide significant evidence that underlying causes of uncertainty do not have linear association with product tardy delivery. This finding reinforces the proposition that the effects of uncertainty are difficult to quantify due to the compound effect. The cluster analyses of the business environmental factors of the manufacturing enterprises in MM, make‐to‐stock (MTS) and MTO environments found that size of enterprise, product variety, product complexity, number of parts, ratio of buy vs make parts, the use of rough‐cut capacity planning, and the use of buffering or dampening techniques in production, influence the effects of underlying causes of uncertainty on product tardy delivery.Research limitations/implicationsOnly UK manufacturing enterprises are investigated. The results will be relevant to MTO, MM and MTS manufacturing environments.Practical implicationsThe application of the business model has provided useful knowledge to MM, MTS and MTO manufacturing enterprises on which underlying causes of uncertainty are significantly affecting their product tardy delivery performance.Originality/valueA holistic approach such as the business model has given a solid foundation for the enterprises to evaluate their performance. Using the knowledge of significant underlying causes of uncertainty, the enterprises could then prioritise the effort and devise suitable buffering or dampening techniques.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference20 articles.
1. Camp, R.C. (1989), Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance, W. Company Ltd, Foulsham.
2. Davies, A.J. and Kochhar, A.K. (1999), “Why British companies don't do effective benchmarking”, International Journal of Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 26‐32.
3. Frizelle, G., McFarlane, D. and Bongaerts, L. (1998), “Disturbance measurement in manufacturing production systems”, Proceedings of the ASI, June, Bremen.
4. Gindy, N. (1998), “Responsive manufacturing”, Assembly Automation, Vol. 18 No. 1.
5. Grubbstrom, R.W. and Molinder, A. (1996), “Safety production plans in MRP systems using transform methodology”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 46, pp. 297‐309.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献