A benchmarking implementation framework for automotive manufacturing SMEs

Author:

Baba ,Mohd Yusof Sha'ri,Azhari

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework for benchmarking implementation in small medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) taking into consideration their characteristics.Design/methodology/approachThe paper begins with the review on the definition of SME and a comparison of the characteristics of SMEs and large organizations. It presents the need for a framework and its relationship with benchmarking and TQM. This is followed by reviewing the benchmarking implementation frameworks proposed by researchers and discusses these frameworks based on their strengths and weaknesses from SMEs perspective. The frameworks were categorised into two broad types based on the different writer's background and the approach on how they view the benchmarking implementation process.FindingsThe paper suggested a conceptual framework for benchmarking implementation dedicated to the automotive manufacturing SMEs. This framework guides them through from the start to end of the benchmarking process. The framework was validated at six pilot case study companies, which gave useful comments and suggestions regarding the usefulness and applicability within the SMEs context.Research limitations/implicationsThe conceptual framework is still in the development stage and research is undertaken to include the pilot study companies suggestions and comments into the final version of the framework.Practical implicationsThis guidance and framework provides a useful guide for companies to adopt and adapt before embarking on their benchmarking journey.Originality/valueThis paper fulfils an identified knowledge gap and offers practical help to SMEs starting out a benchmarking implementation effort.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Strategy and Management

Reference60 articles.

1. Aalbregtse, R.J., Hejka, J.A. and McNeley, P.K. (1991), “Total quality management (TQM): how do you do it?”, Automation, August, pp. 30‐32.

2. Ahmed, P.K. and Rafiq, M. (1998), “Integrated benchmarking: a holistic examination of select techniques for benchmarking analysis”, Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 225‐42.

3. Anthony, D. (1983), “Japan”, in Storey, D.J. (Ed.), The Small Firms: An International Survey, Croom Helm, London, pp. 46‐83.

4. APQC (2001), “Process classification framework”, Developed by: APQC's International Benchmarking Clearinghouse In Partnership with Arthur Andersen & Co., SC.

5. Baumack, C.M. (1988), How to Organise and Operate Small Business, 8th ed., Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3