Author:
Vesty Gillian Maree,Telgenkamp Abby,Roscoe Philip J
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to seek to illustrate the way in which carbon emissions are given calculative agency. The authors contribute to sociology of quantification with a specific focus on the performativity of the carbon number as it was introduced to the organization’s capital investment accounts. In following an intangible gas to a physical amount and then to a dollar value, the authors used categories from the sociology of quantification (Espeland and Stevens, 2008) to explore the persuasive attributes of the newly created number and the way it changed the work of actors, including the way they reacted and viewed authority.
Design/methodology/approach
– An empirical case study in a large Australian water utility drawing on insights from the sociology of calculation.
Findings
– The authors present empirics on the calculative appeal of the carbon emissions number, how it came into being and its performative (or reactive) effects. The number disciplined behaviour and acted like a boundary object, while at the same time, enroled allies through its aesthetic appeal in management accounting system designs. In framing the empirics, the authors were able to highlight how the carbon number became a visible actor in the newly emergent and evolving carbon market.
Practical implications
– This paper provides an empirical framing that continues the project of writing the sociology of calculation into accounting.
Originality/value
– This study contributes to the sociology of quantification in accounting with an empirical framing device to reveal the representational work of a number and how it expands as it becomes implicated in broader networks of calculation.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference68 articles.
1. Andon, P.
,
Baxter, J.
and
Chua, W.F.
(2007), “Accounting change as relational drifting: a field study of experiments with performance measurement”,
Management Accounting Research
, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 273-308.
2. Ascui, F.
(2014), “A review of carbon accounting in the social and environmental accounting literature: what can it contribute to the debate?”,
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal
, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 6-28.
3. Ascui, F.
and
Lovell, H.
(2011), “As frames collide: making sense of carbon accounting”,
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 978-999.
4. Baxter, T.
,
Bebbington, K.J.
and
Cutteridge, D.
(2004), “Sustainability assessment model: modelling economic, resource, environmental and social flows of a project”, in
Henriques, A.
and
Richardson, J.
(Eds),
The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up?
, Earthscan, London, pp. 113-120.
5. Bebbington, J.
(2007),
Accounting for Sustainable Development Performance
, 1st ed., Elsevier, Oxford.
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献