Creating numbers: carbon and capital investment

Author:

Vesty Gillian Maree,Telgenkamp Abby,Roscoe Philip J

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to seek to illustrate the way in which carbon emissions are given calculative agency. The authors contribute to sociology of quantification with a specific focus on the performativity of the carbon number as it was introduced to the organization’s capital investment accounts. In following an intangible gas to a physical amount and then to a dollar value, the authors used categories from the sociology of quantification (Espeland and Stevens, 2008) to explore the persuasive attributes of the newly created number and the way it changed the work of actors, including the way they reacted and viewed authority. Design/methodology/approach – An empirical case study in a large Australian water utility drawing on insights from the sociology of calculation. Findings – The authors present empirics on the calculative appeal of the carbon emissions number, how it came into being and its performative (or reactive) effects. The number disciplined behaviour and acted like a boundary object, while at the same time, enroled allies through its aesthetic appeal in management accounting system designs. In framing the empirics, the authors were able to highlight how the carbon number became a visible actor in the newly emergent and evolving carbon market. Practical implications – This paper provides an empirical framing that continues the project of writing the sociology of calculation into accounting. Originality/value – This study contributes to the sociology of quantification in accounting with an empirical framing device to reveal the representational work of a number and how it expands as it becomes implicated in broader networks of calculation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting

Reference68 articles.

1. Andon, P. , Baxter, J. and Chua, W.F. (2007), “Accounting change as relational drifting: a field study of experiments with performance measurement”, Management Accounting Research , Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 273-308.

2. Ascui, F. (2014), “A review of carbon accounting in the social and environmental accounting literature: what can it contribute to the debate?”, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal , Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 6-28.

3. Ascui, F. and Lovell, H. (2011), “As frames collide: making sense of carbon accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal , Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 978-999.

4. Baxter, T. , Bebbington, K.J. and Cutteridge, D. (2004), “Sustainability assessment model: modelling economic, resource, environmental and social flows of a project”, in Henriques, A. and Richardson, J. (Eds), The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up? , Earthscan, London, pp. 113-120.

5. Bebbington, J. (2007), Accounting for Sustainable Development Performance , 1st ed., Elsevier, Oxford.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3