A visual scoping review of how knowledge graphs and search engine results page designs represent uncertainty and disagreement

Author:

Knight Simon,Bowdler Isabella,Ford Heather,Zhou Jianlong

Abstract

Purpose Informational conflict and uncertainty are common features across a range of sources, topics and tasks. Search engines and their presentation of results via search engine results pages (SERPs) often underpinned by knowledge graphs (KGs) are commonly used across tasks. Yet, it is not clear how search does, or could, represent the informational conflict that exists across and within returned results. The purpose of this paper is to review KG and SERP designs for representation of uncertainty or disagreement. Design/methodology/approach The authors address the aim through a systematic analysis of material regarding uncertainty and disagreement in KG and SERP contexts. Specifically, the authors focus on the material representation – user interface design features – that have been developed in the context of uncertainty and disagreement representation for KGs and SERPs. Findings Searches identified n = 136 items as relevant, with n = 4 sets of visual materials identified from these for analysis of their design features. Design elements were extracted against sets of design principles, highlighting tensions in the design of such features. Originality/value The authors conclude by highlighting two key challenges for interface design and recommending six design principles in representing uncertainty and conflict in SERPs. Given the important role technologies play in mediating information access and learning, addressing the representation of uncertainty and disagreement in the representation of information is crucial.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference66 articles.

1. A systematic review of interaction design strategies for group recommendation systems;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction,2022

2. Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications: American educational research association;American Educational Research Association;Educational Researcher,2006

3. Design principles in design research: a commentary,2019

4. Bing (2018), “Toward a more intelligent search: Bing multi-perspective answers”, 6 February, available at: https://blogs.bing.com/search-quality-insights/february-2018/Toward-a-More-Intelligent-Search-Bing-Multi-Perspective-Answers/ (accessed 21 July 2023).

5. Dr. Google, what can you tell me about homeopathy? Comparative study of the top10 websites in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Mexico and Spain;El Profesional de la Información,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3