Creating a fractal-based quality management infrastructure

Author:

Pronovost Peter J,Marsteller Jill A

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe how a fractal-based quality management infrastructure could benefit quality improvement (QI) and patient safety efforts in health care. Design/methodology/approach – The premise for this infrastructure comes from the QI work with health care professionals and organizations. The authors used the fractal structure system in a health system initiative, a statewide collaborative, and several countrywide efforts to improve quality of care. It is responsive to coordination theory and this infrastructure is responsive to coordination theory and repeats specific characteristics at every level of an organization, with vertical and horizontal connections among these levels to establish system-wide interdependence. Findings – The fractal system infrastructure helped a health system achieve 96 percent compliance on national core measures, and helped intensive care units across the USA, Spain, and England to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections. Practical implications – The fractal system approach organizes workers around common goals, links all hospital levels and, supports peer learning and accountability, grounds solutions in local wisdom, and effectively uses available resources. Social implications – The fractal structure helps health care organizations meet their social and ethical obligations as learning organizations to provide the highest possible quality of care and safety for patients using their services. Originality/value – The concept of deliberately creating an infrastructure to manage QI and patient safety work and support organizational learning is new to health care. This paper clearly describes how to create a fractal infrastructure that can scale up or down to a department, hospital, health system, state, or country.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference21 articles.

1. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1974), Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

2. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective , Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

3. Dixon-Woods, M. , Bosk, C.L. , Aveling, E. , Goeschel, C.A. and Pronovost, P.J. (2011), “Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program”, Milbank Quarterly , Vol. 89 No. 2, pp. 167-205.

4. Mandelbrot, B. (2012), The Fractalist: Memoir of a Scientific Maverick , Pantheon Books, New York, NY.

5. Marsteller, J.A. , Sexton, J.B. , Hsu, Y.J. , Hsiao, C.J. , Holzmueller, C.G. , Pronovost, P.J. and Thompson, D.A. (2012), “A multicenter, phased, cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units”, Critical Care Medicine , Vol. 40 No. 11, pp. 2933-2939.

Cited by 39 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3