Author:
Kultalahti Susanna,Liisa Viitala Riitta
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine some perceptions of Millennials concerning what makes work motivating, and discuss their implications for human resource management (HRM) practices.
Design/methodology/approach
– Empirical data were collected via Facebook using the method of empathy-based stories (MEBS). The theoretical framework is grounded in the literature on motivation.
Findings
– The full-time working Millennials wrote more about intrinsic motivators than extrinsic ones. Additionally, there were several dichotomies of positive and negative factors causing motivation/demotivation. Thus, the results contradict to some extent with the ones of Herzberg's. The stories revealed that the most important things having an effect on motivation were an interesting, varying and flexible job and good relationships with colleagues and supervisor.
Practical implications
– The results revealed some particular factors that should be considered when designing HRM practices to dovetail with the motivational drivers of the Millennials: flexibility, work-life balance, convenient social relationships, need for coaching-based leadership and the opportunity to develop.
Social implications
– Due to retirements and shrinking generations, the impact of Generation Y is increasing in the workforce. Thus, recognising its motivational factors is important.
Originality/value
– The originality of the study partly rests in its methodological innovativeness. Often adopted by sociologists, this study introduces the method of MEBS to the business field. Furthermore, Facebook is still seldom used in data gathering. While much of the extant research on Generation Y is quantitative in nature, the adoption of a qualitative approach allows for the voice of Generation Y to be heard.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference58 articles.
1. Appelbaum, E.
,
Bailey, T.
,
Berg, P.
and
Kalleberg, A.
(2000), Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
2. Arsenault, P.M.
(2004), “Validating generational differences. A legitimate diversity and leadership issue”, The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 124-141.
3. Avery, R.D.
,
Bouchard, T.J. Jr
,
Segal, N.L.
and
Abraham, L.M.
(1989), “Job satisfaction: environmental and genetic components”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74 No. 2, pp. 187-192.
4. Barney, C.E.
and
Elias, S.
(2010), “Flex-time as a moderator of the job stress – work motivation relationship: a three nation investigation”, Personnel Review, Vol. 39 No. 8, pp. 487-502.
5. Basset-Jones, N.
and
Lloyd, G.C.
(2005), “Does Herzberg's motivation theory have staying power?”, The Journal of Management Development, Vol. 24 No. 10, pp. 929-943.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献