Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to study how the foreign currency account (FCA) is affected by the domestic fixed deposit (FD) rate, the FCA rate, the expected exchange rate and exchange rate risk.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper analyses the causal relationship between the domestic FD rate, the FCA rate, the expected exchange rate on a set of foreign currency deposits and exchange rate volatility, based on the theory of portfolio choice. Based on the theory, the panel vector autoregressive regression of fully modified ordinary least squares and dynamic ordinary least squares are modelled.
Findings
There is no cointegrating relationship for the three-month FCA deposits, the domestic FD rate, the FCA rate and the expected exchange rate. Only the six-month FCA business deposits are affected by the domestic FD rate, the FCA rate and the expected exchange rate. The FCA depositors are not affected by exchange rate volatility.
Research limitations/implications
This study is conducted based on the FCA rate quoted by the leading commercial banks in Malaysia, Maybank. Thus, the FCA rate is used as a proxy for the FCA rate of commercial banks in Malaysia.
Originality/value
Individual depositors have to save in more than the three-month FCA to realise their expected return. For individuals, the FCA deposit is not an alternative choice to domestic FD. Exporters may use the FCA deposit to finance their foreign purchases to save the cost of foreign exchange conversion but it is still not an appropriate hedging tool against foreign exchange fluctuations as compared to the existing forward foreign exchange facility.
Reference39 articles.
1. Causal interactions between FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic panel co-integration;Procedia Economics and Finance,2015
2. Foreign currency deposits and the demand for money in developing countries;Journal of Development Economics,1996
3. Hedging foreign exchange rate risk: multi-currency diversification;European Journal of Management and Business Economics,2016
4. Apergis, N. and Payne, J.E. (2010), “Energy consumption and growth in South America: evidence from a panel error correction model”, Energy Economics, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 1421-1426.
5. Baek, J. (2015), “A panel cointegration analysis of CO2 emissions, nuclear energy and income in major nuclear generating countries”, Applied Energy, Vol. 145, May, pp. 133-138.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献