At the end of the road? On differences between women and men in leadership behaviour

Author:

Aarum Andersen Jon,Hansson Per H.

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to explore behavioural differences between women and men in managerial positions and suggest explanations for differences and similarities.Design/methodology/approachIn order to eliminate any effects of organizational differences on leadership behaviour, this study had public managers responding to questionnaires that measured their leadership style, decision‐making style, and motivation profile.FindingsStatistical analyses of data from three groups of Swedish public managers (n=385) revealed virtually no significant differences in behaviour between female and male managers. Regardless of whether there is a female or male majority of employees or a female or male majority of managers, no effect on leadership behaviour occurs.Originality/valueA number of studies indicate that managers' behaviour is different in different types of organizations. This study suggests, therefore, that, independent of gender, organizational and demographic characteristics modify leadership behaviours, thus explaining similarities in leadership behaviour.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference53 articles.

1. Andersen, J.A. (1991), Ledares motivasjon – teori og instrument (Managers and Motivation – A Test of the AMPI Instrument), Lund University Press, Lund.

2. Andersen, J.A. (1999), “Are power‐motivated leaders more effective? A review of McClelland's theory”, in Rahim, M.A., Golembiewski, R.T. and Mackenzie, K.D. (Eds), Current Topics in Management, Vol. 4, JAI Press, Stamford, CT, pp. 41‐59.

3. Andersen, J.A. (2000), “Intuition in managers: are intuitive managers more effective?”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 46‐67.

4. Andersen, J.A. (2010a), “Public vs private managers: how public and private managers differ in leadership behaviour”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 131‐41.

5. Andersen, J.A. (2010b), “Assessing public managers' change‐oriented behavior: are private managers caught in the doldrums?”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 335‐45.

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3