Segment and destroy: the missing capabilities of knowledge management

Author:

Desouza Kevin C.,Awazu Yukika

Abstract

PurposeTo draw management and scholarly attention to two missing capabilities in a knowledge management program: segmentation capability and destruction capability.Design/methodology/approachAn opinion paper based on consulting and research experiences of the authors.FindingsOrganizations that consider the two missing capabilities have witnessed significantly improved knowledge management programs compared with when the capabilities were missing from their agenda. In addition to the two missing capabilities, the third capability – protection capability – may need due attention.Research limitations/implicationsThe two missing capabilities can be further investigated as important constructs. The two capabilities complement and augment their peer capabilities (creation, transfer, storing, retrieving and applying). The intricacies of the missing capabilities and the known capabilities need to be further studied.Practical implicationsIf an organization neglects the two capabilities, the benefits of their knowledge management program will be limited. Organizations can cultivate the two missing capabilities effectively and efficiently by following the suggestions of the paper.Originality/valueThis is the first paper that discusses the two missing knowledge management capabilities exclusively and connects their role and importance to known capabilities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Management Information Systems

Reference11 articles.

1. Barney, J. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99‐120.

2. Davenport, T.H., Thomas, R.J. and Cantrell, S. (2002), “The mysterious art and science of knowledge‐worker performance”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 23‐30.

3. Davenport, T.H., Thomas, R.J. and Desouza, K.C. (2003), “Reusing intellectual assets”, Industrial Management, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 12‐17.

4. Desouza, K.C. (2003), “Barriers to effective use of knowledge management systems in software engineering”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 99‐101.

5. Desouza, K.C. and Awazu, Y. (2004a), “Securing knowledge assets”, J@pan.Inc, Vol. 58, August, pp. 22‐5.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3