Abstract
Purpose
– The first purpose of this study is to explore logistics performance management practices and lessons learned in some supplier/retailer dyads across retail industries. A second purpose is to suggest a continued research agenda for logistics performance management across retail industries.
Design/methodology/approach
– Case studies are conducted in four supplier/retailer dyads in different retailing industries in Sweden. The analysis is of a cross-case character and uses a pattern matching approach.
Findings
– Large differences in practices within and between dyads are found. Some problems were indicated: lack of trust; difficulties in developing a collaborative culture; difficulties in relating metrics to customer value and lacking IT support. A previously unknown obstacle, the internal collaboration with category management, was identified. A good example was found in an industry standard. State-of-the-art descriptions, international comparisons, exploring the interface with the stores and combating identified problems were found to be relevant topics for continued research.
Research limitations/implications
– The limitations are mainly related to the small number of cases, but since the purpose of this study is exploratory, this should be acceptable. The theoretical contribution is a first step in the expansion of knowledge on logistics performance management from manufacturing to retailing companies.
Practical implications
– The practical contribution includes insights in the shape of descriptions and lessons learned in different retail industries.
Originality/value
– No identified study has explored logistics performance management as a whole across retail industries with a dyadic approach.
Subject
Business and International Management,Marketing
Reference27 articles.
1. Amato, L.H.
and
Amato, C.H.
(2009), “Changing retail power and performance in distribution channels”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 37 No. 12, pp. 1057-1076.
2. Barratt, M.
,
Choi, T.Y.
and
Li, M.
(2011), “Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends, research outcomes, and future research implications”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 329-342.
3. Bourne, M.
,
Neely, A.
,
Platts, K.
and
Mills, J.
(2002), “The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives – perceptions of participating managers”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 11, pp. 1288-1310.
4. Brewer, P.
and
Speh, T.
(2001), “Adapting the balanced scorecard to supply chain management”, Supply Chain Management Review, March/April, pp. 48-56.
5. ECR
(2011), “Optimizing your supply chain by using standards”, available at: www.ecr-all. org/ecropedia (accessed 20 April 2012).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献