A contemporary perspective on the disaster management cycle

Author:

Sawalha Ihab Hanna

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine the traditional disaster management cycle; discussing the significance of incorporating contemporary management concepts into the disaster management cycle; and proposing a conceptual model that reflects contemporary management insight for the disaster management cycle.Design/methodology/approachA literature review was made to discuss the significance of moving towards a more contemporary view to the disaster management cycle that brings more value to the final outcomes of the disaster management process. A conceptual model was then proposed to reflect a more contemporary view to the disaster management cycle. The current COVID-19 pandemic has also been addressed explicitly throughout the paper as a case that reflects the necessity of embracing contemporary insight and practise in the traditional disaster management cycle.FindingsThe literature indicates that people worldwide, as well as academics still rely heavily on the traditional disaster management lifecycle to manage disasters and major incidents which consists of four main stages; preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery unrecognizing that each and every disaster is a unique incident itself and that it should be treated differently. Contemporary management thought and insight is still lacking in the study of disaster and emergency management.Practical implicationsThis research offers a contemporary view to the traditional disaster management cycle in which recent concepts of management are used to better cope with the uniqueness of the different major incidents. This view fosters wider involvement of individuals and the general public in the disaster management process and highlights elements of creativity and modernity. The current COVID-19 pandemic, despite the many adverse consequences associated with it, has contributed constructively to the ways the traditional disaster management cycle is being implemented and practised worldwide.Originality/valueThis research is expected to be of a substantial value for those interested in improving performance during the various stages of the disaster management process, as well as those interested in improving organizational, social and national resilience. The traditional disaster management cycle tends to be procedural and therefore needs to embrace contemporary management thought and more value-based approaches.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference73 articles.

1. Al-Bayan (2017), “Dubai’s airports are international role models in dealing with crises (in Arabic)”, available at: www.albayan.ae/economy/local-market/2017-10-01-1.3057524 (accessed 12 January 2019).

2. Building enterprise-wide resilience by integrating business continuity capability into day-to-day business culture and technology;Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning,2008

3. Disasters: lessons learned?;Journal of Geography and Natural Disasters,2012

4. Disaster and emergency planning for preparedness, response and recovery;Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Natural Hazard Science,2015

5. L’Aquila, central Italy, and the ‘disaster cycle’, 2009-2017;Disaster Prevention and Management,2019

Cited by 68 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Disaster Management Cycle, Smart Technologies, Urban Form, Traditional Developments, and Sprawl;Computer and Information Security Handbook;2025

2. Place-centred emerging technologies for disaster management: A scoping review;International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction;2024-10

3. Disaster scenes as a foundation for emergency response planning;International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction;2024-10

4. Resilience in Compound Disasters;Advances in Human Services and Public Health;2024-05-28

5. Disaster Management Activities in an Indian Engineering Institute;Advances in Human Services and Public Health;2024-05-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3