Applied improvisation training for disaster readiness and response
Author:
Tint Barbara S.,McWaters Viv,van Driel Raymond
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to introduce applied improvisation (AI) as a tool for training humanitarian aid workers. AI incorporates principles and practices from improvisational theatre into facilitation and training. It is an excellent modality for training aid workers to deal with crisis and disaster scenarios where decision-making and collaboration under pressure are critical.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper provides a theoretical base for understanding skills needed in disaster response and provides a case for innovative training that goes beyond the current standard. AI principles, activities and case examples are provided. Interviews with development experts who have participated in AI training are excerpted to reveal the impact and promise of this methodology.
Findings
– Different from typical training and games, which simulate potential crisis scenarios, AI works with participants in developing the skills necessary for success in disaster situations. The benefit is that workers are better prepared for the unexpected and unknown when they encounter it.
Research limitations/implications
– The current paper is based on author observation, experience and participant interviews. While AI is consistently transformative and successful, it would benefit from more rigorous and structured research to ground the findings more deeply in larger evidence based processes.
Practical implications
– The authors offer specific activities, resources for many others and practical application of this modality for training purposes.
Social implications
– Its application has tremendous benefits in training for specific skills, in creating greater cohesion and satisfaction in work units and breaking down culture and language barriers.
Originality/value
– This work is original in introducing these training methods to humanitarian aid contexts in general, and disaster preparedness and response in particular.
Subject
Management Information Systems
Reference63 articles.
1. Auf der Heide, E.
(1989), “Disaster response: principles of preparation and coordination”, out of print, available at: www.coe-dmha.org/Media/Disaster_Response_Principals.pdf (accessed 29 November 2013). 2. Balachandra, L.
,
Barrett, F.
,
Bellman, H.
,
Fisher, C.
and
Susskind, L.
(2005a), “Improvisation and mediation: balancing acts”,
Negotiation Journal
, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 425-434. 3. Balachandra, L.
,
Bordone, R.
,
Menkel-Meadow, C.
,
Ringstrom, P.
and
Sarath, E.
(2005b), “Improvisation and negotiation: expecting the unexpected”,
Negotiation Journal
, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 415-423. 4. Balcik, B.
,
Beamon, B.
,
Krejci, C.
,
Muramatsu, K.
and
Ramirez, M.
(2010), “Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges and opportunities”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol. 126 No. 1, pp. 22-34. 5. Bankoff, G.
Frerks, G.
and
Hilhorst, D.
(2004),
Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People
, Earthscan, London.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|