Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore what it is like to be a cleaner in the Netherlands. Drawing on the dirty work theory, it answers the question of how cleaners in the Netherlands cope with the dirty work stigma.
Design/methodology/approach
This study used a qualitative approach: 24 cleaners were interviewed and the researcher participated in a three-month cleaning course. By doing so, an insiders’ perspective was taken. Drawing upon the dirty work theory, a thematic analysis was made.
Findings
Cleaners take great pride in their work, but because of their social invisibility, they are not recognized by the people they work for, and they fail in being proud of themselves. This has moral consequences since cleaners start doubting whether they are seen as equal. Eventually, cleaners have an ambivalent relationship with their job.
Practical implications
Given the moral consequences, FM practitioners and researchers should take these findings into account. As FM value is dependent on the quality of the relations between FM and its stakeholders (e.g. cleaners), FM is challenged to think about its responsibilities toward cleaners and other dirty workers in its context.
Originality/value
There is not much research done in cleaning. The research that is done focuses on efficiency and organization of cleaning. Only little research focuses on the cleaner, an insiders’ perspective is scarce.
Subject
Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference36 articles.
1. Doing cleaning work ‘scientifically’: the reorganization of work in the contract building cleaning industry;Economic and Industrial Democracy,2001
2. ‘How can you do it?’ Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity;Academy of Management Review,1999
3. Emotional politics in cleaning work: the case of Israel;Human Relations,2010
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献