An exploratory analysis of librarians' blogs: their development, nature and changes

Author:

Aharony Noa

Abstract

PurposeThe main purpose of this paper is to compare and examine two points in time of the LIS blogsphere: first period of publication of the blog (first two months for each blog) and a second period (July/August 2008). The research will describe and analyse librarians' blogsphere, focusing on its nature, development, and prevailing tendencies.Design/methodology/approachThis paper presents a statistical descriptive analysis and a thorough content analysis of 30 LIS blogs in two periods of time. The first phase in the investigation is the location of the LIS blogs that meet the research criteria; the second phase is the examination of data related to the posts. The final phase consists of the content analysis of the main ideas of the posts and the development of a subject scheme that represents the analysis.FindingsA thorough examination of blogs' content reveals that there is a current tendency to write essay‐type posts with hypertext links; there are fewer posts and postings days, as well as fewer readers' comments, but a larger number of links and tags which are assigned to the posts. Furthermore, three out of the five main content categories are equivalent in both periods and it seems that the same issues still occupy librarians' minds and thoughts.Originality/valueThe research findings are relevant for librarians and information scientists as they cause them to better understand and delve into the phenomenon of LIS blogsphere.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference44 articles.

1. Adamic, L. and Glance, N. (2005), “The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog”, paper presented at the WWW 2005 Blog Workshop, available at: www. blogpulse.com/papers/2005/AdamicGlanceBlogWWW.pdf (accessed 24 March 2008).

2. Aharony, N. (2009), “Librarians and information scientists blogsphere: an exploratory analysis”, Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 31, pp. 174‐81.

3. Aharony, N. and Bronstein, J. (2008), “The educational technology blogosphere: an exploratory analysis”, paper presented at the ASMI Conference, Haifa.

4. Alcock, M. (2003), “Blogs – what are they and how do we use them?”, Quill, Vol. 103 No. 8, available at: alia.org.au/groups/quill/issues/2003.8/blogs.html (accessed 24 March 2008).

5. Babbie, E. and Mouton, J. (2001), The Practice of Social Research, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A study of social visibility and engagement of world-renowned libraries on Twitter;Digital Library Perspectives;2024-01-25

2. The role of social media in e-recruitment process: empirical evidence from developing countries in social network theory;Journal of Enterprise Information Management;2020-07-24

3. Stakeholder Interaction for Sustainability;Journalism and Ethics;2019

4. State Fragility and Stakeholder Engagement;Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services;2016

5. Researching public libraries and the social web, 2006-2012;Journal of Documentation;2015-07-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3