Research in progress. Part 2 – some preliminary insights into the information needs of the contemporary academic researcher

Author:

Herman Eti

Abstract

The second part of a two‐part paper reports the preliminary conclusions derived from the pathfinder phase of a study devoted to a reassessment of the information needs of academic researchers. Proceeding from the notion that long‐established research information needs may not have remained wholly unaffected by the changing realities of the knowledge society, this exploration of researchers' current information requirements and information seeking practices has been undertaken with a special emphasis on examining the validity of anything and everything we have customarily been holding true as to the information component of academic research work. The groundwork for the investigation has been laid down in a pilot project of seven in‐depth critical incident method‐based information needs interviews with faculty at the University of Haifa (Israel). The qualitative data thus obtained as to researchers' information needs, how they go about meeting these needs, and the barriers they encounter in the process have been analysed within the comprehensive framework proposed by Nicholas for a systematic description of information needs. The ensuing evaluation reported here considers 11 aspects of the present‐day academic researcher's information needs. With the first part of the paper focusing on the insights gained into the two major aspects of subject and function, the subsequent discussion of the remaining aspects rounds out this portrayal of research information needs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference7 articles.

1. Clark, B.R. (1987), The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary, and Institutional Settings, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

2. Garvey, W.D., Tomita, K. and Woolf, P. (1974), “The dynamic scientific information user”, Information Storage and Retrieval, Vol. 10 No. 3‐4, pp. 115‐31.

3. Minsky, B.D. and Marin, D.B. (1999), “Why faculty members use e‐mail: the role of individual differences in channel choice”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 194‐217.

4. Nicholas, D. (2000), Assessing Information Needs: Tools, Techniques and Concepts for the Internet Age, 2nd ed., Aslib, London.

5. Noam, E.M. (1997), “Electronics and the future of the research library”, in Association of College and Research Libraries – ACRL, 8th (1997) National Conference Papers: Choosing Our Futures, available at: http://archive.ala.org/acrl/invited/noam.html (accessed 14 January 2004)..

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Lived Experiences of Slovak and Czech Immigrants to Australia;Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal;2022-01-17

2. Exploring the Inescapable Suffering Among Postgraduate Researchers;International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education;2021-01

3. Reading practices in scholarly work: from articles and books to blogs;Journal of Documentation;2019-05-13

4. References;Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior;2016-04-25

5. Reviewing, Critiquing, Concluding;Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior;2016-04-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3