Online versus offline research: implications for evaluating digital media

Author:

Gunter Barrie,Nicholas David,Huntington Paul,Williams Peter

Abstract

The growth of the Internet and other digital media has opened up exciting opportunities for the provision of public services, for business and for personal transactions. Comparisons between the earliest forms of “online” research, in the form of telephone interviewing, and offline data collection via face‐to‐face interviews or self‐completion questionnaires, revealed that the modality within which research was conducted could affect research findings. In examining the evidence, this paper indicates that the use of online methodologies has important implications for sampling, response rates, quality of data produced, and operational practices in research projects. Online research is restricted to individuals with access to relevant technologies (e.g. the Internet) and where online technology penetration is limited, survey samples are unlikely to represent the general population. Online surveys, however, can produce quicker response rates than offline surveys and also richer open‐ended responses. The important point is to recognise the strengths and weaknesses are associated with different methodologies and what differences can exist between online and offline data collection procedures.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference57 articles.

1. Bachman, D., Elfrink, J. and Vazzana, G. (1996), “Tracking the progress of e‐mail versus snail‐mail”, Marketing Research, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 31‐5.

2. Bachman, D., Elfrink, J. and Vazzana, G. (1999), “E‐mail and snail‐mail face off in rematch”, Marketing Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 10‐15.

3. Brown, J., Culkin, N. and Fletcher, J. (2001), “Human factors in business‐to‐business research over the Internet”, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 425‐40.

4. Carroll, S. (1994), “Questionnaire design affects response rate”, Marketing News, Vol. 28 No. 1, p. 14.

5. Cobanoglu, C., Warde, B. and Moreo, P.J. (2001), “A comparison of mail, fax and web‐based survey methods”, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 441‐52.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3