Of the rich and the poor and other curious minds: on open access and “development”

Author:

Haider Jutta

Abstract

PurposeThe paper seeks to reconsider open access and its relation to issues of “development” by highlighting the ties the open access movement has with the hegemonic discourse of development and to question some of the assumptions about science and scientific communication upon which the open access debates are based. The paper also aims to bring out the conflict arising from the convergence of the hegemonic discourses of science and development with the contemporary discourse of openness.Design/methodology/approachThe paper takes the form of a critical reading of a range of published work on open access and the so‐called “developing world” as well as of various open access declarations. The argument is supported by insights from post‐development studies.FindingsOpen access is presented as an issue of moral concern beyond the narrow scope of scholarly communication. Claims are made based on hegemonic discourses that are positioned as a priori and universal. The construction of open access as an issue of unquestionable moral necessity also impedes the problematisation of its own heritage.Originality/valueThis paper is intended to open up the view for open access's less obvious alliances and conflicting discursive ties and thus to initiate a politisation, which is necessary in order to further the debate in a more fruitful way.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference50 articles.

1. Alvares, C. (1992), Science, Development and Violence. The Revolt Against Modernity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

2. Arunachalam, S. (2003), “Information for research in developing countries: information technology – friend or foe?”, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 16‐21.

3. Bailey, C.W. (2005), “Open access bibliography. Liberating scholarly literature with e‐prints and open access journals”, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, available at: www.escholarlypub.com/oab/oab.pdf (accessed 3 November 2006).

4. Berlin Declaration (2003), Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in Science and the Humanities, available: at: www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess‐berlin/berlindeclaration.html (accessed 31 October 2006).

5. Berry, D.M. and Moss, G. (2006), “The politics of the libre commons”, First Monday, Vol. 11 No. 9, available at: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/berry/index.html (accessed 31 October 2006).

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3