Effectiveness of UMLS semantic network as a seed ontology for building a medical domain ontology

Author:

Na Jin‐Cheon,Leng Neoh Hock

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this article is to examine the effectiveness of the unified medical language system (UMLS) semantic network as a seed ontology for building a medical field ontology.Design/methodology/approachThe information extraction process known as the knowledge engineering approach was used to extract concepts and their semantic relations from documents on “colon cancer treatment”. The UMLS semantic network was used as a seed ontology, and was extended and enriched with the extracted concepts and semantic relations using Protégé.FindingsOnly half of the semantic relations extracted manually were defined (or inferable) in the UMLS semantic network. The remaining half could be added to the network to extend its coverage. In addition, two semantic types in the network were found to be too general and four new sublevel semantic types were proposed to make them more specific.Research limitations/implicationsSince only 109 research paper abstracts in the “colon cancer treatment” domain were analyzed in this study, more abstracts from the colon cancer treatment domain as well as from other cancer treatment domains (such as breast cancer treatment) can be analyzed to give a better generalization of our findings.Originality/valueThis study shares our findings on the effectiveness of the UMLS semantic network as a seed ontology for building a medical domain ontology, and also provides the basic guidelines for building or extending a medical domain ontology using the UMLS.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference18 articles.

1. Achour, S., Dojat, M., Brethon, J.‐M., Blain, G. and Lepage, E. (1999), “The use of the UMLS knowledge sources for the design of a domain specific ontology: a practical experience in blood transfusion”, pp. 249‐53, in proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Medical Decision Making, AIMDM'99, Springer, Berlin.

2. Berners‐Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. (2001), “The semantic web”, Scientific American, pp. 35‐43, available at: www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144‐10D2‐1C70‐84A9809EC588EF21 (accessed 20 October 2007).

3. Eriksson, H. (1992), “Metatool support for custom‐tailored domain‐oriented knowledge acquisition”, Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 445‐76.

4. Gal, A., Modica, G., Jamil, H.M. and Eyal, A. (2005), “Automatic ontology matching using application semantics”, AI Magazine, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 21‐31.

5. Gappa, U. (1995), “Grafische Wissensakquisitionssysteme und ihre Generierung (“Graphical knowledge‐acquisition systems and their generation”), PhD thesis, Infix, DISKI 100, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3