Evidence‐based practice, healthcare delivery and information management

Author:

Isetta Marco

Abstract

PurposeThe evidence‐based practice (EBP) model appears to have established itself as the principal change driver and discourse for the healthcare sector. This study sets out to identify the emergence of the term EBP in the professional literature to establish an empirical foundation for discussion. The understanding of and relevance to healthcare practitioners in a large South West London hospital are assessed and their views related to the perspective of library and information professionals to assess implications for practice.Design/methodology/approachAn extensive literature search was carried out and the data generated used to produce a growth curve for the literature. A survey of health care professionals using e‐mail and follow‐up interviews was undertaken at the case hospital.FindingsBetween 1998 and 2004 the number of papers appearing to discuss the theme increased four‐fold. The first recorded reference was in 1991. The EBP model had strong official and political support in the field. On the user sample there is evidence of resistance to the orthodoxy.Practical implicationsThe EBP model – variously adopted by several healthcare agencies – has placed information management at the centre of the care process. In spite of this, there are few definite implications for the role of library and information professionals, since the world of information and the UK NHS itself are continually in a state of flux, and the current EBP dominance may neither strengthen nor safeguard it.Originality/valueThe bibliometric study provides a baseline. The study of healthcare professionals is a case study to add to knowledge of practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference88 articles.

1. Aarons, G.A. (2004), “Mental health providers' attitudes toward adoption of evidence‐based practice: the evidence‐based practice attitude scale (EBPAS)”, Mental Health Services Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 61‐74.

2. Adily, A. and Ward, J.E. (2005), “Enhancing evidence‐based practice in population health: staff views, barriers and strategies for change”, Australian Health Review, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 469‐77.

3. Al‐Baghlie, N. and Al‐Almaie, S.M. (2004), “Physician attitude towards evidence‐based medicine in eastern Saudi Arabia”, Annals of Saudi Medicine, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 425‐8.

4. Banning, M. (2005), “Conceptions of evidence, evidence‐based medicine, evidence‐based practice and their use in nursing: independent nurse prescribers' views”, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 411‐17.

5. Barry, C.A. (2006), “The role of evidence in alternative medicine: contrasting biomedical and anthropological approaches”, Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 62 No. 11, pp. 2646‐57.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3