Social workers and safeguarding adult reviews (SARs)– an exploration of the stories that are told and the narratives that they hold

Author:

O'Reardon Mary

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the study is to explore the contribution of safeguarding adult reviews (SARs) to the contemporary stories of what social work practice is and what social workers should do. Evidence of this contribution is sought by analysis of SARs as publicly available documents capturing contemporary social work alongside considering social worker’s views of these reports. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents two components of the wider research study as follows: documentary analysis exploring discussions of social work practice held within a sample of SARs xD;xA; and analysis of focus groups and semi-structured interviews established to explore the knowledge, experience and views of front-line social workers in relation to SARs. Findings It is suggested that social workers locate the value of SARs within the arena of learning and development often celebrating the SAR processes in bringing agencies together more so than the actual report. This paper argues that SARs hold considerable power in their ability to present a narrative about contemporary social work in England, and that social workers themselves can be wary of this power. Research limitations/implications The research is limited by the scope of the data which includes a sample of SARs from one geographical area and data collected from social workers who volunteered to participate. Practical implications This paper draws on the evidence gathered and presents some recommendations to support the potential for SARs to positively enhance social work identity and practice. Social implications This paper explores the stories about social work that are found within a sample of SARs and seeks to explore how these stories fit with the stories that social workers themselves share about SARs. Originality/value There has been considerable research interest in SARs; however, to date there has not been a research exploration of the impact of SARs on professional social work and front-line social workers in practice. This paper presents early findings and analysis from research in progress as part of a Doctorate of Social Work Study at University of East London who provided ethical approval and supervisory support.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference57 articles.

1. They don’t want them to have capacity’: multi-agency operationalisation of the mental capacity act 2005 in England with adults who self-neglect;Health and Social Care in the Community, n/a(n/a),2022

2. BASW (2014), “British association of social workers code of ethics”, available at: www.basw.co.uk/about-basw/code-ethics.https://www.basw.co.uk/about-basw/code-ethics

3. Bishop, T. (2019), “MR V: a safeguarding adults review”, Tower Hamlets Safeguarding Adults Board, available at: www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgnl/health__social_care/ASC/Adults_Health_and_Wellbeing/Staying_safe/Safeguarding_Adults_Review.aspx

4. Bishop, T. (2020), “MS E: a safeguarding adults review”, Tower Hamlets Safeguarding Adults Board, available at: www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgnl/health__social_care/ASC/Adults_Health_and_Wellbeing/Staying_safe/Safeguarding_Adults_Review.aspx

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3