Adult protection in Scotland in 1857 and in 2015: what have we learned?

Author:

Campbell Martin

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare recent developments in adult protection legislation, policy and practice in Scotland in 2015 with the first attempts at protection of adults at risk of harm, in 1857-1862, with a particular focus on people with learning disabilities. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses comparative historical research, drawing on primary archive material from 1857 to 1862 in the form of Annual Reports of the General Board of Commissioners in Lunacy for Scotland and associated papers. Findings – Growing public awareness of the extent of neglect and abuse, and the need for overarching legislation were common factors in the development of both the “The Lunacy Act” of 1857 and the Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act of 2007. Both pieces of legislation also had the common aim of “asylum”, and shared some other objectives. Practical implications – Total prevention of abuse of vulnerable adults is an aspiration in law and in policy. There is an evidence base of effectiveness, however, in protecting adults at risk of harm from abuse. Some ecological factors recur as challenges to effective safeguarding activity. These include problems of definition, uncovering abuse, enforcing legislation, evaluating impact and protection of people who are not a risk of harm to others. Originality/value – This paper compares common themes and common challenges in two separate time periods to investigate what can be learned about the development of legislation and practice in adult protection.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference63 articles.

1. Adult Support and Protection Committee Dundee (2012), “Independent convenor’s biennial report to the Scottish Government April 2010-March 2012”, Dundee.

2. ADASS (2011), “Carers and safeguarding adults-working together to improve outcomes”, Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, London.

3. Anderson, N. and Langa, A. (1997), “The development of institutional care for ‘idiots and imbeciles’ in Scotland”, History of Psychiatry , Vol. 8, pp. 243-66.

4. Atkinson, D. , Jackson, M. and Walmsley, J. (Eds) (1997), Forgotten Lives: Exploring the History of Learning Disability , BILD Publications, Kidderminster.

5. Barfoot, M. (2009), “The 1815 act to regulate madhouses in Scotland: a reinterpretation”, Medical History , Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 57-76.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3