Abstract
Purpose
– This study aims to show how diary-style voice recordings can be used to provide social marketers with greater insights into the influences on behaviour than those obtained from interviews. Diary data have the potential to provide deeper insight into the causes of behaviour than can be obtained from retrospective interviews or surveys.
Design/methodology/approach
– Data were collected from 31 smokers and attempting quitters exploring their attributions for smoking and cigarette purchase, using both face-to face interviews and event-contingent voice recordings over a four-day period, with participants asked to make a recording whenever they were tempted to smoke or buy cigarettes.
Findings
– Voice recordings provided additional insights into the influences on smoking and cigarette purchase compared to face-to-face interviews. In particular, voice recordings appeared to provide insight into prompts for purchase and smoking that were not recalled during interviews, and, for some respondents, gave them greater control over unwanted behaviour.
Research limitations/implications
– The study relies on participants’ self-reports, and individuals may be unaware of some of the influences on their behaviour.
Practical implications
– The study shows that voice-recordings offer a novel method of obtaining insight into subtle influences on consumer behaviour that are insufficiently salient to be recalled in retrospective interviews.
Originality/value
– The study shows the value of voice recordings for providing near-real-time insights into triggers for different behaviours, and offers potential for extending the method into other areas of social marketing.
Reference71 articles.
1. Andrews, R.L.
and
Franke, G.R.
(1996), “Dynamics of aggregate response sensitivities to marketing mix variables”,
Journal of Business Research
, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 145-155.
2. Bernard, H.R.
,
Killworth, P.
,
Kronenfeld, D.
and
Sailer, L.
(1984), “The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data”,
Annual Review of Anthropology
, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 495-517.
3. Bettman, J.R.
and
Park, C.W.
(1980), “Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis”,
Journal of Consumer Research
, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 234-248.
4. Bolger, N.
,
Davis, A.
and
Rafaeli, E.
(2003), “Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived”,
Annual Review of Psychology
, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 579-616.
5. Borland, R.
(2011), “Challenges for tobacco control as an increasing proportion of smokers are disadvantaged”, paper presented at the Oceania Tobacco Control Conference, 17-20 October, Brisbane.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献