Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi.
Design/methodology/approach
– The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach.
Findings
– Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money.
Research limitations/implications
– In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries.
Practical implications
– The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials.
Originality/value
– Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference41 articles.
1. Ameen, K.
(2008), “Issues of book acquisition in university libraries: a case study of Pakistan”,
Library Philosophy and Practice 2008
, available at: www.webpages.uidaho.edu/∼mbolin/ameen.htm (accessed 5 August, 2014).
2. Baker, B.B.
(1998), “Resource sharing: outsourcing and technical services”,
Technical Services Quarterly
, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 35-45.
3. Barrett, P.
(2000), “Balancing accountability and efficiency in a more competitive public sector environment”,
Australian Journal of Public Administration
, Vol. 59 No. 3, pp. 58-71.
4. Central Procurement Directorate Online
(2014), “12 procurement principles”, available at: www.dfpni.gov.uk/cpd_12_procurement_principles (accessed 11 February, 2014).
5. Chiweza, D.
(2000), “Brief communication: the impact of national currency devaluation, cash budget system and information on document supply in the University of Malawi: the case of chancellor college library”,
Inter-lending & Document Supply
, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 137-139.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献