Author:
Barkemeyer Ralf,Figge Frank
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to argue that the on-going professionalization and dissemination of the current wave of corporate social responsibility (CSR) concepts and instruments leads to a headquartering effect, i.e. the concentration of CSR-related decision-making within corporate headquarters. This headquartering effect casts doubt on earlier studies suggesting that the “transnational” or “glocal” model can effectively address the multitude of global and local CSR challenges modern multinational companies (MNCs) face.
Design/methodology/approach
– This conceptual paper uses a stakeholder lens, in turn, drawing from resource dependence theory and organizational legitimacy theory to develop under which conditions claims of Southern stakeholders will be considered by Northern MNCs. It provides evidence for the existence of a headquartering effect as a defining characteristic of mainstream CSR approaches.
Findings
– The authors argue that the increasing professionalization and dissemination of mainstream CSR approaches among MNCs reinforce the headquartering effect, with strategic decision-making increasingly confined to the companies’ headquarters, while the scope of action within the subsidiaries and the supply chain of MNCs becomes increasingly restricted over time. Ultimately, this headquartering effect strengthens a Northern CSR/sustainability agenda and fails to empower developing country stakeholders.
Originality/value
– The paper contributes by exploring how international CSR follows a different underlying rationale than international business. While international business research follows an instrumental perspective, international CSR is driven by both instrumental and normative considerations. Thus, international business theories may not be directly applicable to international CSR contexts.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference134 articles.
1. Agle, B.R.
,
Mitchell, R.K.
and
Sonnenfeld, J.A.
(1999), “Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 507-525.
2. Arthaud-day, M.L.
(2005), “Transnational corporate social responsibility: a tri-dimensional approach to international CSR research”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
3. Banerjee, S.B.
,
Iyer, E.S.
and
Kashyap, R.K.
(2003), “Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and influence of industry type”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67 No. 2, pp. 106-122.
4. Barkemeyer, R.
(2008), “Cross-Border CSR and development in the south seen through the lens of organizational legitimacy theory”, 2008 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 8-13
August, Anaheim, CA.
5. Barkemeyer, R.
(2009), “Beyond compliance – below expectations? CSR in the context of international development”, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 273-289.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献