Structure behind principles: social selection mechanisms in corporate governance networks

Author:

Kacanski Slobodan

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to show that social relations in a corporate governance platform between members of supervisory boards and between members of supervisory and executive board tiers can serve as an alternative viewpoint for understanding mechanisms of social selection in corporate governance networks. The study shows that through the lenses of social network analysis, it is possible to identify and understand how the process of corporate governance member selection unfolds within companies and how that selection process may have been potentially influenced by the cross-board relations, such as interlocking directorships.Design/methodology/approachTo estimate network parameters and attribute effects of network tie emergence, this study has used exponential random graph models (ERGMs) on corporate governance data of Danish publicly listed companies. Econometric models are applied to estimate parameter statistics which serve further to explain tendencies of tie emergence.FindingsThe results of this study reveal that the process of selection of both supervisory boards and executive directors is interdependent. Also, the study showed that board members are more likely to select popular supervisory board members and top managers who have their expertise gained through multiple companies affiliated with multiple industries. However, these conditions for CEO selection apply only to the extent to which they have their experience gained from multiple companies but not multiple industries.Originality/valueOn one hand, this study demonstrates that being a dynamic practitioner who is exposed to diverse corporate environments by being affiliated with different companies belonging to different industries generally increases practitioners visibility in the corporate governance network, and therefore their attractiveness to boards of directors. On the other hand, the results show that the research on board assemblage, nowadays, should be rather observed through the methodology of social network analysis as the method gives an opportunity to understand structures through relations, from which the executive tier should not be exempted as well.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference80 articles.

1. Boards, and the directors who sit on them,2017

2. Women on boards in finance and STEM industries;American Economic Review,2016

3. The structure of interorganizational elite co-optation: interlocking corporate directorates;American Sociological Review,1974

4. Economic interest groups and the corporate elite structure;Social Science Quarterly,1978

5. Australian Institute of Company Directors (2016), “Board recruitment: board composition”, https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/∼/media/cd2/resources/director-resources/director-tools/pdf/05446-1-7-mem-director-tools-bc-board_recruitment_a4_web.ashx

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Do female directors of companies appoint audit firms with women in high-level positions?;Gender in Management: An International Journal;2024-09-03

2. EY and KPMG Merger: How Strong Are Relationships Among Board Members and Their Audit Partners? A Network Perspective;Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance;2023-06-06

3. Decision-making in the recruitment of women on corporate boards: does gender matter?;Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal;2022-03-15

4. Impact of corporate network position on strategic risk and company’s performance – evidence from Poland;Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society;2021-12-21

5. Financial soundness of Islamic banks: does the structure of the board of directors matter?;Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society;2021-06-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3