Author:
Chen Zhixiang,Hua Tan Kim
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically explore the relationships among organization ownership structure, implementation of just‐in‐time (JIT), and production operations performance.Design/methodology/approachA theory model for explaining the relationships among ownership, manufacturing strategy and performance was constructed, and then several hypotheses were tested using statistical analysis models based on questionnaire responses from Chinese manufacturing firms.FindingsThe results show that organization ownership not only impacts the implementation of JIT and operations performance, but also impacts the relationship between JIT implementation and operations performance. Moreover, the results show that, for firms operated in China, the implementation frequency of JIT practices varies with organization ownerships; the foreign and joint venture firms (JVFs) were found to have a higher level of JIT implementation and can also achieve better performance from JIT implementation than state‐owned and private‐owned firms (POF). Also, JIT implementation was found to have a significantly positive relationship with operations performance in all types of ownership firms, with the exception of private ownership firms.Research limitations/implicationsThe research only covers manufacturing firms in China. Further research is needed to test the wide implications of this research in other countries or industries.Practical implicationsThis paper provides insights into how to improve JIT implementation performances, especially in various organization ownership structures.Originality/valueThe paper appears to be one of the first studies of relationship between ownership structure and JIT implementation in China manufacturing environment.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference96 articles.
1. Acquaah, M. (2005), “Enterprise ownership, market competition and manufacturing priorities in a sub‐Saharan African emerging economy: evidence from Ghana”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 9 Nos 3/4, pp. 205‐235.
2. Aghazadeh, S.M. (2003), “JIT inventory and competition in the global environment: a comparative study of American and Japanese values in auto industry”, Cross Culture Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 29‐42.
3. Ahmad, S., Schroeder, R.G. and Sinha, K.K. (2003), “The role of infrastructure practices in the effectiveness of JIT practices: implications for plant competitiveness”, Journal of Engineering Technology Management, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 161‐191.
4. Al‐Maarneh, G.F. (2012), “Requirements and obstacles of using just in time (JIT) system: evidence from Jordan”, International Management Review, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 55‐82.
5. Anon (2001), “Battered and cherished: the private sector in China”, Transition, Journal, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 13‐14.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. How does data-driven supply chain analytics capability enhance supply chain agility in the digital era?;International Journal of Production Economics;2024-11
2. Perfect couple or toxic relationship? A meta‐analysis of the effects and interplays of lean and agile strategies to improve performance;Journal of Business Logistics;2024-06-23
3. A business strategy, operational efficiency, ownership structure, and manufacturing performance: The moderating role of market uncertainty and competition intensity and its implication on open innovation;Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity;2023-06
4. Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance;Administrative Sciences;2023-03-02
5. Technology, lean, quality and human resource practices in manufacturing: how does size as a contingency factor matter?;Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management;2023-01-05