Libraries, democracy, information literacy, and citizenship

Author:

Rivano Eckerdal Johanna

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to advocate and contribute to a more nuanced and discerning argument when ascribing a democratic role to libraries and activities related to information literacy. Design/methodology/approach The connections between democracy and libraries as well as between citizenship and information literacy are analysed by using Mouffe’s agonistic pluralism. One example is provided by a recent legislative change (the new Swedish Library Act) and the documents preceding it. A second, more detailed example concerns how information literacy may be conceptualised when related to young women’s sexual and reproductive health. Crucial in both examples are the suggestions of routes to travel that support equality and inclusion for all. Findings Within an agonistic approach, democracy concerns equality and interest in making efforts to include the less privileged. The inclusion of a democratic aim, directed towards everyone, for libraries in the new Library Act can be argued to emphasise the political role of libraries. A liberal and a radical understanding of information literacy is elaborated, the latter is advocated. Information literacy is also analysed in a non-essentialist manner, as a description of a learning activity, therefore always value-laden. Originality/value The agonistic reading of two central concepts in library and information studies, namely, libraries and information literacy is fruitful and shows how the discipline may contribute to strengthen democracy in society both within institutions as libraries and in other settings.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference84 articles.

1. American Library Association (1989), “Presidential committee on information literacy: final report”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.cfm (accessed 13 December 2016).

2. Association of College & Research Libraries (2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm (accessed 13 December 2016).

3. Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) (2015), “Framework for information literacy for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed 13 December 2016).

4. The public sphere and discursive activities: information literacy as socio-political skills;Journal of Documentation,2006

5. Public libraries: a meeting place for immigrant women?;Library & Information Science Research,2011

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3