Researching possibilities in marketing

Author:

Christy Richard,Wood Michael

Abstract

Contrasts prospecting research with in‐depth qualitative research and statistical survey research. Presents a simple model – in mathematical terms, and as a numerical table – to relate the size of a sample to its power in terms of exploring the diversity of possibilities in a market. One implication of this model is that effective prospecting samples tend to be larger than those that are often taken for qualitative research: smaller samples may be surprisingly likely to exclude important possibilities and underestimate the degree of diversity in a population. By implication, qualitative researchers will often benefit from an initial prospecting survey of the market in which they are conducting in‐depth research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference4 articles.

1. Chisnall, P. (1997), Marketing Research, 5th ed., McGraw‐Hill, London.

2. Crimp, M. and Wright, L.T. (1995), The Marketing Research Process, 4th ed., Prentice‐Hall, Hemel Hempstead.

3. Malhotra, N.K. (1996), Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, 2nd ed., Prentice‐Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

4. Sykes, W. (1990), “Validity and reliability in qualitative market research: a review of the literature”, Journal of Market Research Society, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 289‐328.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Anecdote, fiction, and statistics: The three poles of empirical methodology;Possibility Studies & Society;2024-01-10

2. Managing TQM's soft side: an explorative study of social care multiservice organizations;The TQM Journal;2023-03-28

3. Road towards Lean Six Sigma in service industry: a multi-factor integrated framework;Business Process Management Journal;2016-07-04

4. Forces influencing the speed of internationalisation;Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development;2016-02-15

5. Exploring the Secret of Successful University Brands;Developing Business Strategies and Identifying Risk Factors in Modern Organizations;2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3