Gathering meaningful service user feedback regarding a community forensic service

Author:

Bamford Karen,Benton Carl

Abstract

Purpose – Engaging with people with a learning disability to develop and enhance service provision is central to the ethos of personalisation and citizenship. Despite this there appears to be a lack of research to gather users’ views on how they feel the services meet their unique needs and how these could be improved. A service evaluation was developed to understand service user’s experience of accessing a community forensic service (CFS). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The questionnaire was conducted by an independent third party experienced in facilitating complex communication, utilising a written format and Widget Rebus symbols. Questions were based on Trust Values, family and friends test and clinical forensic engagement. The samples were service users open to the CFS on 1 July 2014. Findings – Data were gathered from 28 individuals, there was an even spread of ages 17-65. In all, 93 per cent understood what help they needed from the service, there was acknowledgement of who they would go to if they wanted to complain, 100 per cent were happy with how information had been provided, most felt the service was respectful, fair, friendly and they were listened to. Practical implications – The findings suggest that more needs to be done around understanding and engagement in care planning. There are plans to gather information from direct carers and setting up focus groups to further understand some of the issues and ways forward. Originality/value – Asking for feedback from people who have offended, some of whom now experience increased restrictions, is fraught with concern and approached with trepidation. However, the responses received contradict the natural instincts. The results showed promising appreciation of the support received in the context of everyday lives and positive risk taking.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Pshychiatric Mental Health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Baker, P. (2003), “Best interest? Seeking the views of service users”, in Allen, D. (Ed.), Ethical Approaches to Physical Intervention: Responding to Challenging Behaviour in People with Intellectual Disabilities , BILD Publications, Kidderminster, pp. 153-63.

2. Baker, V. , Oldnall, L. , Birkett, E. , McCluskey, G. and Morris, J. (2010), “Adults with learning disabilities (ALD)”, Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists Position Paper, RCSLT, London.

3. Ball, J. and Shanks, A. (2012), “Gaining feedback from people with learning disabilities”, British Journal of Occupational Therapy , Vol. 75 No. 10, pp. 471-7.

4. Benton, C. and Garvey, R. (2013), “Practice leadership in community forensic learning disability services”, in Jukes, M. (Ed.), Practice Leadership in Mental Health and Intellectual Disability Nursing , Quay Books, London, pp. 167-79.

5. Benton, C. and Roy, A. (2008), “The first three years of a community forensic service for people with a learning disability”, The British Journal of Forensic Practice , Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 4-12.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3