Evaluating the sustainable performance of corporate boards: the balanced scorecard approach

Author:

Aly Ahmed Hussein,Mansour Mohamed Elsayed

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a method for evaluating the sustainable performance of corporate boards using the balanced scorecard approach. Also, the paper aims to determine the need and relevance of the proposed method in the evaluation process by testing the differences in the relative importance of the proposed method measures on a sample of the Egyptian manufacturing companies. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected using a questionnaire list and personal interviews with three different population samples: board members, managers of manufacturing companies and financial analysts in brokerage firms. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test the degree of approval on the related questions, and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to test the differences among the responses of the three samples. Findings The results of the statistical analysis indicate that there is a need for companies to have an effective tool to evaluate the board performance, and that the proposed method is a suitable tool for the evaluation. Also, the results indicate that there are differences in the relative importance of the performance measures among the three samples. Research limitations/implications The exploratory study focused on a sample of manufacturing companies only. Accordingly, service companies and financial institutions are outside the scope of this research. There was difficulty in accessing a sample of shareholders; instead, this sample was replaced by a group of financial analysts in brokerage firms. Practical implications The proposed method adds to the performance evaluation literature with regard to measuring and evaluating the performance of boards. The study provides an empirical evidence of the need to use the balanced scorecard in the board evaluation and its relevance for the evaluation process. It provides a short guide to the most important performance measures to be used in the evaluation process of the company’s board of directors. Originality/value Few studies have focused on evaluating the performance of the board of directors using the balanced scorecard. This study is an important attempt to evaluate the sustainable performance of the board of directors using the balanced scorecard by taking into consideration the corporate social responsibility perspective. The proposed board’s balanced scorecard provides a useful tool to evaluate the performance of boards using objective, specific and clear measures.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference84 articles.

1. Advanced management accounting techniques in manufacturing: utilization, benefits and barriers to implementation;Accounting Forum,2000

2. Board evaluation: use it to develop strength;Directorship,2006

3. An empirical analysis of lead benchmarking and performance measurement;International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,2005

4. Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) (2003), “Principles of good corporate governance and best practice recommendations”, Corporate Governance Council, Australian Stock Exchange, available at: www.asx.com.au/documents/about/principles-and-recommendations-march-2003.pdf

5. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes non-financial performance measures;The Accounting Review,2000

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Two Decades of African Accounting Research 2000–2019: Synthesis, Reflection, Gaps, and Future Directions;Journal of International Accounting Research;2023-03-01

2. The relationship of balanced scorecard perspectives and government organization performance measurement;International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;2022-02-15

3. Balanced scorecard usage and organizational effectiveness: evidence from manufacturing sector;Measuring Business Excellence;2021-12-03

4. Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use;Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management;2021-08-26

5. Determinants of the quality of external board evaluation in the UK;Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society;2021-07-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3