Application of precautionary principle in international trade law and international environmental law

Author:

Haseeb Ansari Abdul,Wartini Sri

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of writing this paper is to present a comparative but critical assessment of the applicability of the precautionary principle (PP) under the SPS Agreement, which is a part of the WTO regime by implication, and under the Cartagena Protocol, which has been made under the Convention on Biological Diversity. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents an analytical exposition of both the sets of laws, trade law and environmental law. The methodology adopted is library based. The approach is to bring about an amicable co-existence of both the laws so that they could serve the dual purpose, i.e. promotion of trade and protection of “human, animal and plant life and health” and conservation of the environment. Findings – The DSB of the WTO should give due importance to the PP and should apply it liberally, keeping also in view the environmental aspects, so that along with free trade human, animal and plant health and life, and conservation of the environment are also protected. Practical implications – It will change the present paradigm and will bring both the sets of laws together. Originality/value – It focuses on the life and heath of poor people around the world. It, thus, pleads for application of strong PP.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Industrial relations

Reference90 articles.

1. Aaron, C. (2009), A Sustainable Development Roadmap for the WTO, Trade and Investment Program, IISD, available at: www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/sd_roadmap_wto.pdf (accessed 23 December 2009).

2. Abdul Ghafur, H. (2007), Public International Law: A Practical Approach, Prentice-Hall, Petaling Jaya.

3. Anais, K. (2005), “Laid law, it is better to be safe than sorry”, Vict. U. Wellington L. Rev., Vol. 36, p. -.

4. Andrew, D.M. (2007), “The legal basis for using principle in WTO dispute”, J. Int'l Econ. L., Vol. 10, pp. 801-802.

5. Anja, L. and Michael, M. (2005), “Dispelling the chimera of ‘self-contained regimes’ international law and the WTO”, Eur. J. Int'l L., Vol. 16, p. -.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3