Author:
Athavale Amod S.,Banahan, III Benjamin F.,Bentley John P.,West-Strum Donna S.
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to identify antecedents and consequences of pharmacy loyalty behavior.
Design/methodology/approach
– A cross-sectional study was conducted. Constructs involved were measured using an online self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic and linear regression.
Findings
– In all, 400 usable responses were obtained. General satisfaction (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52; p < 0.01; 95 per cent confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 2.06) and trust (OR = 1.81; p < 0.01; 95 per cent CI = 1.32 to 2.50) were found to have statistically significant relationships with loyalty behavior. General satisfaction (regression coefficient = 0.20; p < 0.01; 95 per cent CI = 0.09 to 0.31), explanation component of satisfaction with service quality (regression coefficient = 0.13; p < 0.01; 95 per cent CI = 0.04 to 0.21), consideration and technical competence components of satisfaction with service quality (regression coefficient = 0.18; p = 0.02; 95 per cent CI = 0.03 to 0.33) and trust (regression coefficient = 0.33; p < 0.01; 95 per cent CI = 0.21 to 0.45) were statistically significantly related to positive word-of-mouth promotion. General satisfaction (regression coefficient = −0.29; p < 0.01; 95 per cent CI = −0.3 to −0.18), consideration and technical competence components of satisfaction with service quality (regression coefficient = −0.17; p = 0.02; 95 per cent CI = −0.31 to −0.03) and trust (regression coefficient = −0.21; p < 0.01; 95 per cent CI = −0.33 to −0.10) had statistically significant relationships with negative word-of-mouth promotion.
Research limitations/implications
– Pharmacists can utilize these results to develop better marketing strategies. These results can be used by researchers to forward this area of research. This study had some study design limitations that may affect its generalizability.
Originality/value
– Effect of satisfaction as a multidimensional construct on pharmacy loyalty behavior and word-of-mouth promotion, identification of drivers of negative word-of-mouth promotion and effect of pharmacy trust on pharmacy loyalty behavior and word-of-mouth promotion are some of the major contributions of this study.
Reference77 articles.
1. American Pharmacists Association
(2013),
Medication Therapy Management Digest
, American Pharmacists Association, Washington, DC, p. 28.
2. Amine, A.
(1998), “Consumers’ true brand loyalty: the central role of commitment”,
Journal of Strategic Marketing
, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 305-319.
3. Anderson, R.E.
and
Srinivasan, S.S.
(2003), “E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: a contingency framework”,
Psychology and Marketing
, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 123-138.
4. Biong, H.
(1993), “Satisfaction and loyalty to suppliers within the grocery trade”,
European Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 21-38.
5. Bitner, M.J.
(1990), “Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses”,
Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 69-82.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献