A three-stage grey evaluation method for assessing the performance of interdisciplinary organizations

Author:

Yi YangORCID,Zhu Jianjun,Tong Huagang

Abstract

PurposeThis study constructs a three-stage evaluation model for interdisciplinary organizations to solve their ranking problems effectively.Design/methodology/approachA three-stage interdisciplinary organization evaluation model abounds the key problems of “who will evaluate the projects?” and “how to evaluate the projects?”. In the first stage, the authors build a consensus maximization model to identify the selected experts based on the interval grey number because of the uncertainty in assessment. In the second stage, considering the reliability of the experts, the authors calculate the reliability of the experts based on historical data. Meanwhile, considering the gradual changes of the experts, the dynamic weighting method is obtained based on the clustering method. In the third stage, considering decision-makers regret psychological behavior, the authors construct a cross-organizational performance evaluation model based on consensus expectations.FindingsFirst, for selecting the experts responsible for assessing interdisciplinary organizations, the consensus-reaching method can effectively avoid cognitive bias. Second, during the assessment, the authors obtained more reasonable results by considering the psychological changes of experts based on regret theory. Third, based on the results, the cross-organization of colleges focused on the achievements of talent training, cross effects, and system construction.Practical implicationsOur study could help organizations establish a suitable assessment mechanism and promote interdisciplinary development.Originality/valueFirst, considering the importance of selecting the experts, the authors use the consensus-reaching process for expert selection. This method could guarantee most experts' preferences. Then, the authors propose a two-stage dynamic weighting method, including a pre-determined and adjusted process. The dynamic method can better perform the preferences of experts. Third, the authors studied the assessment in interdiscipline. In addition, based on the framework and considering the features of the interdiscipline, the authors use the grey number to perform the uncertain preferences of the experts using regret theory.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference25 articles.

1. Building consensus in group decision making with an allocation of information granularity;Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2014

2. Study on grey multiple attribute group decision-making method without weight information;Chinese Journal of Management Science,2008

3. An approach to group decision-making with uncertain preference ordinals;Computers and Industrial Engineering,2010

4. Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making;Journal of the Operational Research Society,2021

5. A linear programming method based on an improved score function for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers and its application to decision-making;International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3