Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to deconstruct the economic position of Turkey in comparison to its immediate neighbors, Central and South‐Eastern Europe (CSEE), and the Middle East, with a specific emphasis on Japanese Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).Design/methodology/approachSeveral determinants of FDI intensity identified in the extant research are used to conduct this comparative analysis. The data is based on the foreign subsidiaries of Japanese firms.FindingsThe results confirm the ambiguous position of Turkey. It enjoys a high Gross Domestic Product growth despite a relatively low openness to trade. From cultural and political risk perspectives it is closer to the Middle East than to CSEE. In spite of its location advantages, the institutional environment continues to be an impediment, preventing Turkey from realizing its full investment potential. Thus, Japanese investors choose to invest in CSEE economies, which are slightly closer culturally to Japan, and significantly less risky.Research limitations/implicationsThe descriptive nature of this study is due to a limited sample size. The comparison of a country with two regions might be too simplistic. Focus on Japanese FDI limits generalizability.Practical implicationsThe results of this analysis confirm the importance of continuous market liberalization and political stabilization measures for attracting FDI. Government policies in the region should not only attempt to remedy local deficiencies but strive to create a comprehensive institutional framework.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the emerging market research in the region with paucity of data. Although comparisons among various European regions are common, such tri‐lateral analyses are rare.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference50 articles.
1. Akyüz, A. (2007), Turkey EU Accession, 12th Annual International Studies Symposium, Toronto, February 10.
2. Ali, A.J. and Camp, R.C. (1995), “Teaching management in the Arab world”, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 10‐17.
3. Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986), “Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 17, pp. 1‐26.
4. Bahcheli, T. (2005), “Maps Turkey's road to EU membership. It is a path with many twists and turns”, McGill International Review, Vol. 4, pp. 16‐21.
5. Barkema, H.G. and Vermeulen, F. (1997), “What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures?”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 845‐64.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献