A clinical database for measuring outcomes in a low-secure service: a feasibility study

Author:

Edworthy Rachel,Khalifa Najat

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present the arguments for sustaining a clinical database, assess its feasibility in a low-secure service, examine the data that can be captured and discuss what this means for practice implications and service development. The paper aims to demonstrate how a clinical database can provide information on three key areas: what patients are like before admission, what is done with them whilst they are in hospital and what happens to them when they are discharged. The paper also aims to examine the practical, legal and ethical implications of building such a database. Design/methodology/approach – This is conducted in the form of a feasibility study charting the development and implementation of an inpatient clinical database for a low-secure inpatient service. Findings – The feasibility of creating and maintaining a clinical database in a low-secure service has been assessed and the paper has found that they are an invaluable source of data that all mental health services should strive to develop. They will enable services to track their own outcome measures and tailor their service and interventions according to the needs of service users. However, ethical and legal issues surrounding building clinical databases are complex and require careful consideration. Research limitations/implications – This is a small-scale study that captured the experience of one service. Ideally this research should be expanded with nationwide clinical database development. Practical implications – This paper includes implications for the implementation of a clinical database, the resources needed for the running of this and the development of standardised outcome measures for mental health services. Originality/value – This is potentially an innovative way of developing a clinical database for a low-secure unit and some of the first research into the feasibility of a database for this population. Its practical application is relatively new and potentially innovative in how it is applied.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Black, N. (1998), “Clinical governance: fine words or action?”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 316 No. 7127, pp. 297-8.

2. Bowen, D.J. , Kreuter, M. , Spring, B. , Cofta-Woerpel, L. , Linnan, L. , Weiner, D. , Bakken, S. , Patrick Kaplan, C. , Squiers, L. , Fabrizio, C. and Fernandez, M. (2009), “How we design feasibility studies”, American Journal of Preventative Medicine, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 452-7.

3. Chambers, J. , Yiend, J. , Barrett, B. , Burns, T. , Doll, H. , Fazel, S. , Jenkinson, C. , Kaur, A. , Knapp, M. , Plugge, E. , Sutton, L. and Fitzpatrick, R. (2009), “Outcome measures used in forensic mental health research: a structured review”, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 9-27.

4. Darzi, A. (2008), High Quality Care for All NHS Next Stage Review Final Report, Department of Health, London, available at: www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_085828.pdf (accessed 4 March 2013).

5. Department of Health (2010), “Using the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) payment framework – a summary guide”, available at: www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_091443 (accessed 10 July 2012).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3