Author:
Rogers Paul,Lowe Michelle,Boardman Matthew
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact victim symptomology, victim resistance and respondent gender have on attributions of blame, credibility and perceived assault severity in a hypothetical child sexual abuse case.
Design/methodology/approach
– In total, 356 respondents read a hypothetical child sexual abuse scenario in which victim symptomology (negative vs none vs positive) and victim resistance (resistant vs non-resistant) were manipulated before completing six childhood sexual abuse (CSA) attribution items. The impact these manipulations plus respondent gender differences had on attributions ratings was explored via a series of AN(C)OVA.
Findings
– Overall, respondents judged the victim more truthful if she displayed negative – as opposed to either no or positive (i.e. life affirming) – symptomology and a resistant victim to be more truthful than one who offered no resistance. Finally, men deemed a 14-year-old female victim of sexual assault less reliable and more culpable for her own abuse than women. Men were particularly mistrustful of the girl if she was non-resistant and later failed to display negative, post-abuse symptomology.
Practical implications
– Findings highlight the need for greater awareness of the fact that not all CSA survivors display stereotypically negative post-abuse symptoms. The current study also extends knowledge of the role victim resistant and respondent gender play in this growing research field.
Originality/value
– The current study is the first to explore attributions of CSA blame and credibility across negative (i.e. typical) verses no or positive/life affirming (i.e. atypical) post-abuse symptomology.
Subject
Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference46 articles.
1. Andover, M.S.
,
Zlotnick, C.
and
Miller, I.W.
(2007), “Childhood physical and sexual abuse in depressed patients with single and multiple suicide attempts”, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 467-74.
2. Back, S.
and
Lips, H.M.
(1998), “Child sexual abuse: victim age, victim gender, and observer gender as factors contributing to attributions of responsibility”, Child Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 22 No. 12, pp. 1239-52.
3. Bornstein, B.H.
,
Kaplan, D.L.
and
Perry, A.R.
(2007), “Child abuse in the eyes of the beholder: lay perceptions of child sexual and physical abuse”, Child Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 375-91.
4. Bottoms, B.L.
and
Goodman, G.S.
(1994), “Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 702-32.
5. Broussard, S.D.
and
Wagner, W.G.
(1988), “Child sexual abuse: who is to blame?”, Child Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 563-9.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献