Abstract
PurposeFacilities such as FabLabs and Makerspaces are characterized by the facilities' wide range of digital fabrication technologies as well as facilities' interdisciplinary user base and collaborative problem solving and product development. These possibilities can also hold great potential for people with disabilities who have a specific need for assistive technology. Since there are no established models of such participatory development processes (PDP) within digitalized innovation environments (DIE), this study intends to provide a comprehensive understanding of these processes along with the influencing factors.Design/methodology/approachThrough a cooperation with a Thalidomide Association, various PDPs were accompanied within a DIE and interviews were conducted with 16 stakeholders involved. Hereby, the perspective of thalidomide-affected people (5) as well as the supporting makers (6) and experts (5) were taken into account. Through a subsequent structured analysis, various dimensions as well as relevant influencing factors could be identified.FindingsIn total, 33 paraphrases could be formed in 8 categories and four dimensions concerning the PDPs investigated. In addition, 17 paraphrases on potentials and challenges could be extracted through generalization.Originality/valueDue to findings' holistic approach, the findings form an empirical basis for further research into this still very young research topic and represent a first step toward theory building. By the applicability of the identified influencing factors an important contribution can be made to the supply of aids and the inclusion of people with disabilities.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon 10.1108/JET-01-2022-0013
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Computer Science Applications,Rehabilitation,Health (social science)
Reference36 articles.
1. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights;MIS Quarterly,2013
2. Bieling, T. (2021), “2. Design Als forschungsparadigma”, in Bieling, T. (Ed.), Inklusion als Entwurf, Birkhäuser, pp. 75-96.
3. Bieling, T. and Joost, G. (2018), “Technikgestaltung und Inklusion – Behinderung im Spannungsfeld von Technologie und Design”, in Burchardt, A. and Uszkoreit, H. (Eds), IT für soziale Inklusion, De Gruyter Oldenbourg, pp. 11-28.
4. Peer production by persons with disabilities – opening 3D-printing aids to everybody in an inclusive MakerSpace;Journal of Enabling Technologies,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献