Applying an information-seeking dialogue model in an interactive information retrieval system

Author:

(Jenny) Yuan Xiaojun,J. Belkin Nicholas

Abstract

Purpose – People often engage in different information-seeking strategies (ISSs) within a single information-seeking episode. A critical concern for the design of information retrieval (IR) systems is how to provide support for these different behaviors in a manner which searchers can easily understand, navigate and use, as they move from one ISS to another. The purpose of this paper is to describe a dialogue structure that was implemented in an experimental IR system, in order to address this concern. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted a user-centered experiment to evaluate the IR systems. Participants were asked to search for information on two different task types, with four different topics per task, in both the experimental system and a baseline system emulating state-of-the-art IR systems. The authors report here the results related explicitly to the use of the experimental system's dialogue structure. Findings – For one of the task types, most participants followed the search steps as predicted in the dialogue structures, and those who did so completed the task in fewer moves. For the other task type, predicted order of moves was often not followed, but participants again used fewer moves when following the predicted order. Results demonstrate that the dialogue structures the authors designed indeed support effective human information behavior patterns in a variety of ways, and that searchers can effectively use a system which changes to support different ISSs. Originality/value – This study shows that it is both possible and beneficial, to design an IR system which can support multiple ISSs, and that such a system can be understood and used successfully.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference37 articles.

1. Allan, J. (2005), “HARD Track overview in TREC 2004: high accuracy retrieval from documents”, in Voorhees, E.M. and Buckland, L.P. (Eds), TREC 2004, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text Retrieval Conference, Washington, DC, available at: http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec13/t13_proceedings.html (accessed May 2, 2010).

2. Anonymous for review purposes.

3. Anonymous for review purposes.

4. Baeza-Yates, R. (2011), Modern Information Retrieval: the Concepts and Technology Behind Search, 2nd ed., ACM Press Books.

5. Bates, M.J. (1989), “The design of browsing and berry-picking techniques for the online search interface”, Online Review, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 407-423.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3