Effects of scenario planning on participant mental models

Author:

Glick Margaret B.,Chermack Thomas J.,Luckel Henry,Gauck Brian Q.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to assess the effects of scenario planning on participant mental model styles.Design/methodology/approachThe scenario planning literature is consistent with claims that scenario planning can change individual mental models. These claims are supported by anecdotal evidence and stories from the practical application of scenario planning. This research study documents the responses of 129 participants from 10 organizations using the mental model style survey as a pretest and posttest, with scenario planning as the intervention. Paired samples t‐tests were performed between participant pretest and posttest, to test hypotheses on all five factors of the mental model style survey.FindingsResults provide evidence that scenario planning can change individual mental model styles. More specifically, results show that scenario planning promotes efficiency, social, and systems mental model styles, with moderate effect sizes.Research limitations/implicationsThe implications of this research include contribution to the growing body of quantitative studies attempting to document the impact scenario planning has on participants. Implications for future research include the use of control groups to isolate effects of the scenario planning intervention.Originality/valueThe study documents one of the largest sample sizes to date in scenario planning research and makes a clear contribution in clarifying significant changes in mental model styles from pretest to posttest.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference67 articles.

1. Al‐Diban, S. and Ifenthaler, D. (2011), “Comparison of two analysis approaches for measuring externalized mental models”, Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 16‐30.

2. Allee, V. (1997), The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence, Focal Press, Newton, MA.

3. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1996), Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

4. Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (2008), Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

5. Bradfield, R.M. (2008), “Cognitive barriers in the scenario development process”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 198‐215.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3