Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal

Published:2011-09-27 Issue:8 Volume:35 Page:826-840
ISSN:0309-0590
Container-title:Journal of European Industrial Training
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Palaiologos Anastasios,Papazekos Panagiotis,Panayotopoulou Leda

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the performance appraisal (PA) aspects that are connected with organizational justice, and more specifically three kinds of justice, namely distributive, procedural and interactional justice.Design/methodology/approachThe research is based on a sample of 170 respondents who answered a questionnaire giving their perceptions on the purpose and criteria of PA, their satisfaction from PA and organizational justice.FindingsThe results show that procedural, distributive and interactional justice are related with different elements of performance appraisal. Elements of satisfaction are strongly related to all aspects of organizational justice. The PA criteria are related to procedural justice.Research limitations/implicationsThe main limitation is that the research provides information based only on one source, that of the appraisee. However, it highlights the role of employee satisfaction to organizational justice, linking different sources of satisfaction to different elements of justice.Practical implicationsThis paper has practical implications for HRD, as it provides HR practitioners with suggestions on how to increase the perceived justice of the PA system.Originality/valueThe value of this paper is to HR practitioners who design PA systems, and also managers acting as appraisers of their subordinates.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Development,General Business, Management and Accounting,Education

Reference60 articles.

1. Ambrose, M.L. (2002), “Contemporary justice research: a new look at familiar questions”, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, Vol. 89 No. 1, pp. 803‐12.

2. Babakus, E., Cravens, D.W., Johnston, M. and Moncrief, W.C. (1996), “Examining the role of organizational variables in the salesperson job satisfaction model”, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 33‐46.

3. Bartol, K.M., Smith, R.H., Durham, C.C. and Poon, J.M.L. (2001), “Influence of performance evaluation rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 6, pp. 1106‐19.

4. Beer, M. (1987), “Performance appraisal”, in Lorch, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 286‐99.

5. Bernardin, H.J., Hagan, C.M., Kane, J.S. and Villanova, P. (1998), “Effective performance management: a focus on precision, customers and situational constraints”, in Smither, J.W. (Ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 3‐48.

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The moderating role of workplace spirituality on the effect of organizational justice on job satisfaction;Frontiers in Psychology;2024-08-02

2. The impact of 360-degree feedback on innovative behavior within the organization: the mediating role of organizational justice;International Journal of Organizational Analysis;2024-06-21

3. Formalization of annual performance feedback and employees’ job satisfaction in the SME context;Journal of Small Business Management;2024-04-02

4. Organizational justice, job satisfaction and academic rank: a moderating mediation study on employee commitment in Ethiopian public universities;African Journal of Economic and Management Studies;2024-02-06

5. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Organizational Justice and Project Performance: A Systematic Literature and Science Mapping Review;Buildings;2024-01-17