Abstract
Purpose
– Psychology, both as science and practice, has been largely developed in one cultural area of the world: Europe and North America. As a result, the discipline is culture-bound, limited in its origins, concepts, and empirical findings to only this small portion of the world. The discipline is also culture-blind, largely ignoring the influence of the role of culture in shaping the development and display of human behaviour. These limitations have resulted in the dominant position of a Western Academic Scientific Psychology (WASP) in relation to other cultural perspectives on human behaviour. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper draws on concepts and strategies in psychology (particularly cross-cultural and intercultural psychology) to propose some remedies to problems arising from the dominant WASP position. For example, of what relevance is such a limited perspective to understanding human activity in other cultures; and how can such a limited understanding serve the purpose of effective intercultural interactions?
Findings
– The eventual goal is to achieve a global psychology that incorporates concepts and findings from societies and cultures from all parts of the world, one that will permit a valid understanding of people within their cultures, and permit effective intercultural across cultures.
Originality/value
– The paper presents some criticisms of the dominant western psychology (WASP), and proposes that the achievement of a more global psychology may be within reach if some concepts and methods now available in psychology from both the dominant western sources and from those working in the rest of the world are used.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies
Reference46 articles.
1. Aberle, D.F.
,
Cohen, A.K.
,
Davis, A.
,
Levy, M.
and
Sutton, F.X.
(1950), “Functional prerequisites of society”,
Ethics
, Vol. 60, pp. 100-111.
2. Ali, A.
,
Van der Zee, K.I.
and
Sanders, G.
(2003), “Determinants of intercultural adjustment among expatriate spouses”,
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
, Vol. 27, pp. 563-580.
3. Allwood, C.M.
(1998), “The creation and nature of indigenized psychologies from the perspective of the anthropology of knowledge,
Knowledge and Society
, Vol. 11, pp. 153-172.
4. Allwood, C.M.
and
Berry, J.W.
(2006), “Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: an international analysis [special issue]”,
International Journal of Psychology
, Vol. 41, pp. 243-268.
5. Berry, J.W.
(1974), “Psychological aspects of cultural pluralism”,
Topics in Culture Learning
, Vol. 2, pp. 17-22.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献