Abstract
The study described in this article aimed to gather insights into what people think when they search the Internet for information. The premise is that people relate to information services and systems metaphorically. In other words, they identify the system or service as analogous to something perhaps more mundane or commonplace. These are known as wild metaphors. They help to explain the unknown or unfamiliar and help us to learn new things. They arise from our individual beliefs and backgrounds but they are also inevitably influenced by our collective experience of contemporary media characterisations of the Internet. This study relates the analogies that academics in Australia report for the Internet with the satisfaction that they derive from information seeking on the network. It provides some insight into how academics in Australia perceive the Internet when they use it to search for information.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference29 articles.
1. Bates, M.J. (1979), “Idea tactics”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 280‐9.
2. Belkin, N.J. (1990), “The cognitive viewpoint in information science”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 16, pp. 11‐15.
3. Belkin, N.J.et al. (1982), “ASK for information retrieval: Part I. background and theory”, Journal of Documentation,Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 61‐71.
4. Borgman, C.L. (1986), “Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information‐retrieval studies”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 387‐400.
5. Borgman, C.L.et al. (1989), “Designing an information retrieval interface based on children’s categorization of knowledge”, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 26, pp. 81‐95.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献