Improving the American health system: moving from inglorious socialism to the free market

Author:

Aggarwal Raj,Bohinc Jerry

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present the three critical changes needed to reform the US health care system – these changes will drive cascades of other beneficial changes. These three changes include the use of transparent market prices, alignment of incentives and systematic assessment and ratings of quality. Design/methodology/approach – The paper used an analysis based on the literature on the comparison between non-market and market systems. The current US health care system is similar to the Soviet economic system, and the paper proposes moving it gradually to where it can respond to market-based signals. Findings – The US health care system needs to adopt transparent and real pricing, independent quality assessment of health provider organizations and portable electronic patient records. These changes will lead to continuing cascades of innovation and improvement. Research limitations/implications – The recommended changes will be opposed by vested interest groups, and so will be easier with regulatory guidance and encouragement. It would also be useful to protect against “regulatory capture” by interested parties during the change process. Practical implications – Health care in the USA will gradually become better and cheaper. Health organizations will become more transparent. Regulators would have to set up and supervise private quality ratings agencies. Social implications – Social implications of this paper include greater labor mobility and higher productivity, as well as increased competitiveness of the USA. Originality/value – In spite of numerous writings on the subject, this issue has not been analyzed in this way. This paper is unique in the way in which it layouts the process of movement to a market-based system for the US health care system.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference13 articles.

1. Boudreaux, G. (2003), “Americas changing health care economy: a review of the recent literature”, Management Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 17-35.

2. Business Week (2013), “Health care”, Business Week, 7 January, pp. 28-29.

3. Davis, K. , Schoen, C. and Stemikis, K. (2010), “Mirror, mirror on the wall: how the performance of the US health care system compares internationally update”, Commonwealth Fund Publication No. 1400, available at: www.commonwealthfund.org/∼/media/Files/Publications/FundReport/2010/Jun/1400_Davis_Mirror_Mirror_on_the_wall_2010.pdf

4. Gawande, A. (2012), “Big med”, New Yorker, 13 August, available at: www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/08/13/120813fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all (accessed 12 September 2014).

5. Hansen, S. (2012), “What can Mississippi learn from Iran?”, New York Times, 27 July, p. -.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3