Social dominance orientation and mentorship

Author:

Martin Daniel,Bok Stephen

Abstract

Purpose – In all, 218 business/psychology working students contributed to the validation of the 20-item Mentor Expectations Measure (MEM). Mentors expected outcomes of mentoring protégés based on protégé race and mentors’ level of social dominance orientation (SDO) were established. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Study 1: to better understand the structure of the newly created MEM, (and to take the first step toward establishing a model) the authors conducted an exploratory factor analysis, using principle axis factoring procedure for extraction with direct oblimin rotation. The factor analysis yielded four viable factors. Study 2: participants were the same 218 working undergraduate students from a mid-sized university located on the west coast of the USA. SDO and social desirability were collected and survey participants were presented a stimulus story written so that the reader would take on the perspective of a mentor within a formal organizational mentorship program. Participants were randomly assigned stories in which they, as the mentor, receive a new protégé (the manipulated variable – perceived ethnicity). Other than the names of the protégés, the stimulus stories and questionnaires were exactly the same. The survey consisted of 63 questions in total. Findings – Given evidence of discriminatory behavior toward those that threaten hierarchical norms, the authors anticipated worse expectations for the mentorship to be found in the African American protégé manipulation. Based on the literature, the authors also anticipated stronger interactions between SDO and the mentorship expectations based on the discipline of the mentor. Participant-mentors estimated expected mentor outcome rewards from mentoring a Black or White protégé. No interactions were established, but SDO was a significant predictor of lessened expectations across several elements of the mentorship. This suggests that high levels of SDO in workplace hierarchies manifest poor expectations toward mentorship outcomes no matter the race/ethnicity or disciplinary back ground of the mentor. Research limitations/implications – While the subjects in the study represent realistic entry level managers and the sample size is acceptable, the authors would like to replicate using larger sample sizes in the future. Practical implications – The development of the MEM reflects a step forward in the psychometric matching of mentors with protégé. The authors recommend utilizing the MEM to evaluate mentors before establishing a relationship and making sure that the relationship is based on clear expectations, knowledge and balanced interpersonal relationships. Importantly, understanding the impact of individual differences like SDO will facilitate more productive relationships than matching on just ethnic and gender-based commonality. Social implications – As significant negative correlations (at the 0.01 level) were found between SDO and mentor commitment, mentor tangible rewards, as well as mentor intrinsic rewards. The negative relationships suggests that as SDO levels increase, participants level of commitment to the protégé lessens, their expectation of tangible rewards based on the mentor ship lessen, and their own levels of intrinsic rewards will diminish. This paints a picture of low expectations for the protégé based on one’s level of SDO, which surprisingly does not seem to interact with race of protégé. Originality/value – First, the MEM can facilitate the matching of mentors and protégés’. Second, researchers (Klauss, 1981; Kram, 1985) have pointed out that formal mentorship relationships may suffer due to the lack of initiative and commitment which the MEM clarifies. Third, the MEM can be used to examine and existing mentorship relations. Fourth, established use of the MEM or mentorship assessment would signal a “culture of mentoring, with organizations broadcasting the seriousness with which they take mentorship. Finally, the authors establish the impact of SDO on mixed race mentorships.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference92 articles.

1. Aguilar-Gaxiola, S. , Norris, R.C. and Carter, F.J. (1984), “The roles of mentors in the lives of graduate students”, paper presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April.

2. Allen, T.D. and Poteet, M.L. (1999), “Developing effective mentoring relationships: strategies from the mentor’s viewpoint”, The Career Development Quarterly , Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 59-73.

3. Allen, T.D. , Poteet, M.L. and Russell, J.E.A. (2000), “Protégé selection by mentors: what makes the difference?”, Journal of Organizational Behavior , Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 271-282.

4. Allen, T.D. , Eby, L.T. , O’Brien, K.E. and Lentz, E. (2008). The state of mentoring research: a qualitative review of current research methods and future research implications”, Journal of Vocational Behavior , Vol. 73 No. 3, pp. 343-357.

5. Anderson, E.M. and Shannon, A.L. (1988), “Toward a conceptualization of mentoring”, Journal of Teacher Education , Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 38-42.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Employee Silence: Commitment to Status Quo among Liberals and Conservatives with High Social Dominance;Asian Academy of Management Journal;2023-06-30

2. Improving Mentoring in Higher Education in Undergraduate Education and Exploring Implications for Online Learning;Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED);2020-09-30

3. E-MENTORSHIP FOR LIFELONG LEARNING;INTED2019 Proceedings;2019-03

4. Vocational behavior from the dark side;Journal of Vocational Behavior;2019-02

5. Mentorship programs in the manufacturing industry;European Journal of Training and Development;2018-09-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3