Abstract
Purpose
It is essential to track the development of resource and pollution intensive industries such as textile, leather, pharmaceutical, etc., under burgeoning pressure of environmental compliance. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyze the progress of Indian leather industry in terms of individual factors and total factor productivity.
Design/methodology/approach
This study applies and examines the various concepts of productivity such as labor productivity, capital productivity, material productivity and energy productivity. Further, it assesses and compares the performance of Indian leather industry in Tamil Nadu (TN), West Bengal (WB) and Uttar Pradesh (UP) based on productivity analysis, spatial variations determinants in productivity and technology closeness ratio.
Findings
The findings suggest that as per the productivity analysis, WB leather clusters have performed remarkably better in terms of partial factor productivity and technical efficiency (TE), followed by TN and UP. This can be attributed to shifting of leather cluster of WB to a state-of art leather complex with many avenues for resource conservation. Further, the findings reveal that the firm size and partial factor productivities have significant positive correlation with TE which supports technological theory of the firm.
Practical implications
The results of this study can be useful for the policy makers associated with the Indian leather industry especially to design interventions to support capacity building at individual firm level as well as cluster level to enhance the efficiency and productivity of overall industry.
Social implications
The findings also support the resource dependence theory of firm according to which the larger size firms should reflect on resource conservation practices, for instance the concept of prevention is better than cure based upon 3R (reduce, recycle and reuse) principles.
Originality/value
The paper gives an explanation of the productivity in the leather industry in terms of its factor productivity and TE.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference167 articles.
1. The impact of external pressure and sustainable management practices on manufacturing performance and environmental outcomes;International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2016
2. AERB (2015), “Leather & leather products sector in India: strategy to facilitate exports”, ASSOCHAM Economic Research Bureau (AERB), Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM), Delhi, available at: www.assocham.org/newsdetail.php?id=4905 (accessed May 1, 2015).
3. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models;Journal of Econometrics,1977
4. Engels’ pause: technical change, capital accumulation, and inequality in the British industrial revolution;Explorations in Economic History,2009
5. ASI (2014), “Ministry of statistics and programme implementation”, Govt. of India, New Delhi, available at: http://mospi.nic.in/mospi_new/upload/asi/ASI_main.htm?status=1&menu_id=88
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献